Pollution is bad. We agree.
I just disagree with your spin that this $15B will "fix" the problem.
Sure, more efficient stoves are a good thing. http://www.stoveteam.org/why/why.html I'm a big fan of efficiency. I drive a diesel, remember? I disagree that the Copenhagen meeting and process isn't going to help. http://www.nytimes.c...&pagewanted=print FWIW. Cheers, Scott. |
|
|
the 100 billion dollar tax will do exactly what?
other than enrich the wallets of the bureaucrats who run it and the scammers at the other end. Wont do a damn thing to reduce carbon or soot.
|
fix global warming for 15 billion, tops
- (boxley)
- (10)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 12:18:55 PM EST
That's odd
- (drook)
- (5)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 12:42:16 PM EST
show me a link where I said it doesnt exist?
- (boxley)
- (4)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 01:17:26 PM EST
Gotta consider the physics.
- (Another Scott)
- (3)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 02:50:11 PM EST
if that is correct then homeopathy is good medicine :-)
-NT
- (boxley)
- (2)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 02:55:26 PM EST
Hardy.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 03:05:16 PM EST
just greenin ya
- (boxley)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 03:07:51 PM EST
Hmmm...
- (Another Scott)
- (3)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 03:28:53 PM EST
so stopping air pollution is not a good idea?
- (boxley)
- (2)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 05:18:33 PM EST
Pollution is bad. We agree.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 05:32:39 PM EST
the 100 billion dollar tax will do exactly what?
- (boxley)
- Dec. 17, 2009, 06:40:49 PM EST