Evolution now stores in SQLite format.
Much more betterer on disk space and quickness.
I've only had Evo screw up on me... 7 or so years ago. Mostly my own doing.
I've used Evolution nearly continuously since then. Thunderbird IMO SUCKS!
Anyone got a good "how to move email" howto?
- (drook)
- (21)
- Dec. 7, 2009, 04:36:47 PM EST
Re: Anyone got a good "how to move email" howto?
- (folkert)
- (14)
- Dec. 7, 2009, 04:42:02 PM EST
Only one problem ... well maybe more than one
- (drook)
- (13)
- Dec. 7, 2009, 07:07:07 PM EST
A hosts file is fine.
- (static)
- (12)
- Dec. 7, 2009, 07:44:30 PM EST
But both servers think they serve the same domain
- (drook)
- (11)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 12:45:47 AM EST
IMAP doesn't care.
- (static)
- (10)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 05:57:31 PM EST
Yup, churning away now
- (drook)
- (6)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 06:58:40 PM EST
IMAP Keeps what the Clients sets.
- (folkert)
- (5)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 09:31:19 PM EST
Don't have access to the source
- (drook)
- (1)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 09:44:51 PM EST
Re: Don't have access to the source
- (folkert)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 09:56:22 PM EST
No, IMAP-to-IMAP transfer is safer.
- (static)
- (2)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 09:49:07 PM EST
Re: No, IMAP-to-IMAP transfer is safer.
- (folkert)
- (1)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 09:54:22 PM EST
If I cared about fast or efficient, sure
- (drook)
- Dec. 9, 2009, 12:04:04 AM EST
Could they be "clever" on the back-end?
- (drook)
- (2)
- Dec. 9, 2009, 02:03:44 PM EST
It would be very difficult.
- (static)
- (1)
- Dec. 9, 2009, 05:25:08 PM EST
Yep, IMAP seems pretty durable
- (drook)
- Dec. 9, 2009, 06:58:02 PM EST
What Greg said.
- (static)
- (1)
- Dec. 7, 2009, 05:10:58 PM EST
Evolution will be fine with thousands of messages.
- (pwhysall)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 12:09:49 AM EST
That was my tech-career ender
- (mhuber)
- (2)
- Dec. 7, 2009, 06:47:59 PM EST
Good thing he said "we"
-NT
- (drook)
- (1)
- Dec. 7, 2009, 07:04:44 PM EST
"we" didn't get fired.
-NT
- (mhuber)
- Dec. 7, 2009, 08:42:58 PM EST
Why did I wait so long to do this?
- (drook)
- Dec. 8, 2009, 12:07:33 PM EST