so back to gas lines?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #316,089 by boxley 10/23/09 9:15:07 AM Reply	so back to gas lines?
Post #316,132 by Mycroft_Holmes_Iv 10/24/09 7:00:58 AM Reply	Actually your both wrong This occurred under Nixon, not Carter (or FDR) Although, someone could argue that it lead to the gas lines under Carter -- naw...that would take the stigma off of Carter.
Post #316,142 by beepster 10/24/09 10:23:51 AM Reply	Re: Actually your both wrong I knew you were talking wage and price freezes under nixon in early 70s. It has been nearly universally accepted as a really bad move. My response was simply to say we've done stupid things before and we're apparently primed and ready to do stupid things again. I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
Post #316,166 by Mycroft_Holmes_Iv 10/24/09 10:00:07 PM Reply	Chuckle Not arguing it was a GOOD idea... but I do laugh when people (usually Republicans) have complained that "Obama is doing something UNPRECEDENTED".
Post #316,173 by boxley 10/25/09 9:44:31 AM Reply	repos that used to be democrats maybe we had wage and price controls from hoover till kennedy then johnson launched the war on poverty and quickly got enmired I think carter was the first to repeal most of that with reagan repealing the rest. Now we are rapidly going towards the nixon model

Looks like they'll be some exec jobs opening up - (beepster) - (47) - Oct. 21, 2009, 05:42:23 PM EDT

If he hasn't stored enough already to be liquid ... - (drook) - (1) - Oct. 21, 2009, 06:00:50 PM EDT

when a clerk makes more ... - (beepster) - Oct. 22, 2009, 07:46:16 AM EDT

Pay for Performance has its downside, too. -NT - (Another Scott) - (42) - Oct. 21, 2009, 07:05:44 PM EDT

Interesting take on gov't mandated pay. - (beepster) - (41) - Oct. 22, 2009, 07:45:26 AM EDT

It's already in place in many areas. - (Another Scott) - (40) - Oct. 22, 2009, 08:02:54 AM EDT

I have no issue... - (beepster) - (39) - Oct. 22, 2009, 08:38:40 AM EDT

Suppose *anyone else* had fronted the money - (drook) - (38) - Oct. 22, 2009, 08:58:13 AM EDT

What world are... - (folkert) - Oct. 22, 2009, 09:11:10 AM EDT

is there a point there? - (beepster) - (36) - Oct. 22, 2009, 09:18:45 AM EDT

Sounds like Circuit City? - (folkert) - (2) - Oct. 22, 2009, 09:33:13 AM EDT

Not really, nobody would give CC any money at all. - (beepster) - (1) - Oct. 22, 2009, 09:40:39 AM EDT

The time they... - (folkert) - Oct. 22, 2009, 11:17:13 AM EDT

"Top performers"? Really? - (drook) - (19) - Oct. 22, 2009, 10:24:06 AM EDT

There's no definition attached - (beepster) - (18) - Oct. 22, 2009, 10:43:46 AM EDT

Saying that government money is "involved" ... - (drook) - (7) - Oct. 22, 2009, 10:51:42 AM EDT

Where do you stop? - (beepster) - (6) - Oct. 23, 2009, 12:09:19 AM EDT

Difference between ownership and contracting - (crazy) - (5) - Oct. 23, 2009, 06:24:18 AM EDT

Many contractors wouldn't exist - (beepster) - (4) - Oct. 23, 2009, 03:53:09 PM EDT

Whoa - (crazy) - (3) - Oct. 23, 2009, 04:35:45 PM EDT

They don't own controlling interest - (beepster) - (2) - Oct. 23, 2009, 04:44:13 PM EDT

Um... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 23, 2009, 05:41:12 PM EDT

Politics vs Rules - (beepster) - Oct. 24, 2009, 10:32:16 AM EDT

Details from Bloomberg. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Oct. 22, 2009, 10:52:14 AM EDT

Wish I could download that - (drook) - (1) - Oct. 22, 2009, 11:12:34 AM EDT

FlashGot should grab it for you. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 22, 2009, 11:31:31 AM EDT

Re: There's no definition attached - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - (6) - Oct. 23, 2009, 08:49:34 AM EDT

so back to gas lines? -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Oct. 23, 2009, 09:15:07 AM EDT

Actually your both wrong - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - (3) - Oct. 24, 2009, 07:00:58 AM EDT

Re: Actually your both wrong - (beepster) - (2) - Oct. 24, 2009, 10:23:51 AM EDT

Chuckle - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - (1) - Oct. 24, 2009, 10:00:07 PM EDT

repos that used to be democrats maybe - (boxley) - Oct. 25, 2009, 09:44:31 AM EDT

that makes it all better - (beepster) - Oct. 23, 2009, 03:47:46 PM EDT

That's not what's happening. - (Another Scott) - (12) - Oct. 23, 2009, 04:09:55 PM EDT

I'll tell you why! - (crazy) - (11) - Oct. 23, 2009, 04:40:01 PM EDT

If you choose not to see it - (beepster) - (10) - Oct. 23, 2009, 04:48:01 PM EDT

I had a great response - (crazy) - (2) - Oct. 24, 2009, 12:43:52 PM EDT

To be safe, one needs to use an external editor to post. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 24, 2009, 12:56:41 PM EDT

Got that too - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - Oct. 24, 2009, 09:55:20 PM EDT

So THIS is where tho corner is being turned? - (mhuber) - (6) - Oct. 24, 2009, 01:22:11 PM EDT

This is pretty blatant - (beepster) - (5) - Oct. 24, 2009, 03:03:49 PM EDT

Your rose colored glasses are pretty foggy. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 24, 2009, 03:30:30 PM EDT

I don't watch them - (beepster) - Oct. 25, 2009, 08:43:01 AM EDT

No, I don't think I'm overzealous - (mhuber) - (2) - Oct. 25, 2009, 04:20:27 AM EDT

Just so I've got this straight ... - (drook) - (1) - Oct. 25, 2009, 12:40:32 PM EDT

IRLRPD. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 25, 2009, 03:18:07 PM EDT

Dean Baker reminds us of the obvious. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 27, 2009, 06:41:33 AM EDT

It can't be zero - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - Oct. 27, 2009, 10:22:00 PM EDT

None more embeddeder, I'd say.
71 ms