IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Yeah, but don't miss the forest for the trees.
1) Holder is still evaluating changes to Bush's policies on the GWoT.
2) Keep in mind that he expresses his opinions on things like investigating Bush's policies, but he expects Congress to do their job. Once/If the majority in the Senate increases enough to reduce the filibuster threat (after the 2010 elections), expect Congress to be less afraid to figure out who did what when.
3) Obama still sets the agenda in the Administration. If Summers and Geithner and ... aren't up to the job, I have little doubt that he'll bring in new blood. Who was he supposed to pick to hit the job running on these issues? He had to pick people with previous government experience, and that means Clinton people. (Carter's people are too old by now.)
4) The policy and tactics in Afghanistan are also being reviewed. I'm heartened that he's spoken much less frequently about "defeating the Taliban" since last summer. He does recognize the complexity of the situation. I expect significant changes when the review is complete.
5) (Broken record, I know but) Gitmo is also being reviewed.
6) Obama's trying desperately to build a big tent while making sure that no single group has a veto on the policy. It takes time.
7) We'll see how the signing statement stuff turns out... :-/

As for what he's done, it's easy to take the MSM punditry view and only see stasis and crisis. But he has changed things a lot with more changes to come. Compare the Laws passed (and signed) by the 111th Congress in the last 2-3 months with those under similar time frames under Bush. http://www.thomas.go...111/d111laws.html

By all means be skeptical and keep an eye on him. I'm attempting to do the same, but I refuse to buy into the meme that some are trying to push (not you) that Obama has already failed. :-)

Cheers,
Scott.
New Excuse me you 2
but were we not promised CHANGE...and now you seem to defend using status quo as a defense?

I agree that 2 months doesn't make the man's legacy...but it has NOT been a pretty 2 months by any stretch of the imagination.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New Re: Yeah, but don't miss the forest for the trees.
I'm not whining, or at least trying not to. Obama was cut a lot of slack to get voted in; he was running on promises with no backing. I had a bad feeling when he folded on the FISA vote. As Jake pointed out, he's a professional politician. I really don't want to believe that means that everything he says is bullshit.

As far as all the evaluations going on, since he is a constitutional scholar, he could just say, "This is fucking illegal. MAKE IT STOP!" He IS the head of the party and they have control and his job description DID have a requirement to protect the constitution.
As far as a big tent, if he's really trying to co-opt the Republicans, I'm going to have to reevaluate my estimation of his intelligence. He is still a popular president. He could use that to try to at least kick his own people into line to advance his agenda. If he's not going to go that far, he's not going to advance any change whatsoever. He has Pelosi and Reid, both of whom are so tough their shit has muscles, but only when facing other Democrats. When a Republican gives them a dirty look, they roll over on their backs and pee on their stomachs. If he can't get them in line, he needs to do something about it. That, at least, is normal party politics.

Routinely killing civilians by remote control, because they MIGHT be standing near a "bad guy" is SO antithetical to our alleged society that I just don't know where a review would begin. They could use the same drones to get pictures and see if they could leverage Pakistan's government to do some of the foot work. I mean, since we really don't live over there and all...

Looking forward to 2010 or 2012 is also a non-starter. I'd really like some of these losers to actually do their friggin job NOW. If it's not too much trouble...

I just don't know. I guess I just don't see the big picture. Or about half of my life's savings, for that matter. Still, I'm better off than somebody standing next to an Afghani Jehovahs Witness while drones are flying...
New on drones and targets
killing the indians you can find because you cant find the ones you want to kill has been US policy for a long time.
Sherman's march to the sea.
carpet bombing of german civilians
carpet bombing and nuking japanese
puff and b52's in Nam
nothing new here
thanx,
bill
New Duh!
It is antithetical to our social values. We've been fuckheads for a while now. I was kinda hoping for change. Walk it like we talk it? Maybe next time.
     if true, this president is an idiot and should be toast - (boxley) - (19)
         What do you want, man? - (beepster)
         He's outta his mind - (jbrabeck) - (1)
             You can't say that - (beepster)
         I'll wait and see. - (Another Scott) - (12)
             Of course you are ;-) -NT - (beepster) - (11)
                 A little more... - (Another Scott) - (10)
                     its on the table - (boxley) - (9)
                         Lessee if I've got this straight -- vulture capitalism is - (Ashton) - (8)
                             I'm afraid that the two month sword cuts both ways. - (hnick) - (7)
                                 +5 Enlightened -NT - (beepster) - (1)
                                     You know, I have to say - (jake123)
                                 Yeah, but don't miss the forest for the trees. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                     Excuse me you 2 - (beepster)
                                     Re: Yeah, but don't miss the forest for the trees. - (hnick) - (2)
                                         on drones and targets - (boxley) - (1)
                                             Duh! - (hnick)
         It has been dumped - (jay) - (2)
             You're being gracious - (beepster)
             bothers me that he had a hard time identifying stupid -NT - (boxley)

No! Try not! Do or do not, there is no try.
53 ms