IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Me repeating it?
Post #305,091
by beepster
3/4/09 3:38:48 PM
Reply
New Me repeating it?
I'm not the one calling Rush the leader of the Republican party or claiming that his has some political power. That would be you, my friend.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
Post #305,093
by drook
Picture of drook
3/4/09 3:45:01 PM
Reply
New Was referring to the "frequently accused" line
When you say you are frequently accused of falling for the ploy du jour, that means the Republican ploy, which you are parroting, yes? And I don't think you fall for it. I think it's more accurate to say you often recite the ploy du jour.
--

Drew
Post #305,096
by Ashton
3/4/09 3:56:10 PM
Reply
New (Surely you've known for years..
that Beep was paid under-the-table by er, Admin..? ~~ to stir up the complacent Doves in these parts.)
-- but when those funds from the Murican Academy of Sophomoric Chit-Chat ran out -- he just ran with the role.

It's a John Galt kinda thing, I wot ... even if ya don't quite pass for Gary Cooper.

;^>
Post #305,101
by beepster
3/4/09 5:26:34 PM
Reply
New What Republican ploy would that be?
Is that the one where they appointed El Rushbo to the head of the party and didn't tell anybody?

No, this would be the Democratic ploy this time..the one that has prominent Democrats out there quipping to the media about Rush being the leader of the party, etc...which you seem more than happy to agree with...accurate or not.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
     I'm sorry, Rush. - (Silverlock) - (34) - March 4, 2009, 08:07:46 AM EST
         remember McCarthy? - (boxley) - (33) - March 4, 2009, 08:49:52 AM EST
             This is all a game - (beepster) - (32) - March 4, 2009, 09:58:45 AM EST
                 Ya know - (jake123) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 10:07:06 AM EST
                     face it Jake if it wasnt for hnic no one would voluntarily - (boxley) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 10:18:51 AM EST
                         I'd have to disagree with that - (jake123) - March 5, 2009, 10:17:28 AM EST
                     So when the US Gov't takes over all radio stations - (beepster) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 10:46:01 AM EST
                         Some places they de-facto do - (mhuber) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 01:05:41 PM EST
                             Just cut it out - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 01:41:32 PM EST
                 No - (drook) - (19) - March 4, 2009, 10:47:25 AM EST
                     So don't vote for them. - (beepster) - (18) - March 4, 2009, 11:05:28 AM EST
                         He has the power given to him by the Republicans. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (17) - March 4, 2009, 11:42:12 AM EST
                             They're not doing it. - (beepster) - (16) - March 4, 2009, 01:45:52 PM EST
                                 There weren't too many Democrats at CPAC. - (Another Scott) - (15) - March 4, 2009, 02:22:12 PM EST
                                     No I'm not (and d'uh ^^) - (beepster) - (7) - March 4, 2009, 03:20:45 PM EST
                                         Yes you are - (drook) - (6) - March 4, 2009, 03:30:44 PM EST
                                             BS. Pure and simple - (beepster) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:36:33 PM EST
                                                 I'm not talking about the campaign - (drook) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 03:45:12 PM EST
                                                     Why is that such a big deal? - (beepster) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 05:24:08 PM EST
                                                         You seem to be missing the point. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 07:38:48 PM EST
                                                             I'm missing that poiint? - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 10:13:30 PM EST
                                                     And lets look at that apology being spun - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 05:58:43 PM EST
                                     ..nor Father Coughlan; in the '30's: Our Rwanda propagandist - (Ashton) - (6) - March 4, 2009, 03:29:13 PM EST
                                         Aren't I the one oft accused of falling for the ploy du jour - (beepster) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:32:06 PM EST
                                             No one thinks you're dumb enough to fall for it - (drook) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 03:34:34 PM EST
                                                 Me repeating it? - (beepster) - (3) - March 4, 2009, 03:38:48 PM EST
                                                     Was referring to the "frequently accused" line - (drook) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 03:45:01 PM EST
                                                         (Surely you've known for years.. - (Ashton) - March 4, 2009, 03:56:10 PM EST
                                                         What Republican ploy would that be? - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 05:26:34 PM EST
                 And by the way ... - (drook) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:48:20 PM EST
                     They have an option. - (beepster) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 05:31:08 PM EST
                         If that were true . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - March 4, 2009, 09:19:02 PM EST
                             Amenuensis. -NT - (Ashton) - March 4, 2009, 09:48:46 PM EST
                             And again... - (beepster) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 10:11:40 PM EST
                                 For that argument to be valid . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - March 5, 2009, 12:06:28 AM EST

So, what we gonna do tonight, Bwain?
113 ms