IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Ya know
Post #305,047
by jake123
3/4/09 10:07:06 AM
Reply
New Ya know
the radio announcer/DJ in Rwanda who helped incite the genocide there was very successful too; he had great ratings. Just sayin'.

Does this mean I equate Rush with him? No... but the simple fact of great ratings and money making doesn't justify itself absent any other context.
Post #305,049
by boxley
3/4/09 10:18:51 AM
Reply
New face it Jake if it wasnt for hnic no one would voluntarily
watch Canadian television
Post #305,130
by jake123
3/5/09 10:17:28 AM
Reply
New I'd have to disagree with that
Da Vinci's Inquest, Intelligence, The Border... yeah, nobody watched those shows.
Post #305,052
by beepster
3/4/09 10:46:01 AM
Reply
New So when the US Gov't takes over all radio stations
and puts Rush in drive time...we can talk about this being a comparison.

Of course the ONLY radio station in the country is going to have good ratings. D'uh.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
Post #305,065
by mhuber
3/4/09 1:05:41 PM
Reply
New Some places they de-facto do
Armed Forces Radio, in some parts of the world, is pretty much the only English language station around.

Don't know if Rush is still on it all the time, though. He was for a while.

Post #305,072
by beepster
3/4/09 1:41:32 PM
Reply
New Just cut it out
it was a silly comparison...no matter how you try and spin it.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
     I'm sorry, Rush. - (Silverlock) - (34) - March 4, 2009, 08:07:46 AM EST
         remember McCarthy? - (boxley) - (33) - March 4, 2009, 08:49:52 AM EST
             This is all a game - (beepster) - (32) - March 4, 2009, 09:58:45 AM EST
                 Ya know - (jake123) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 10:07:06 AM EST
                     face it Jake if it wasnt for hnic no one would voluntarily - (boxley) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 10:18:51 AM EST
                         I'd have to disagree with that - (jake123) - March 5, 2009, 10:17:28 AM EST
                     So when the US Gov't takes over all radio stations - (beepster) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 10:46:01 AM EST
                         Some places they de-facto do - (mhuber) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 01:05:41 PM EST
                             Just cut it out - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 01:41:32 PM EST
                 No - (drook) - (19) - March 4, 2009, 10:47:25 AM EST
                     So don't vote for them. - (beepster) - (18) - March 4, 2009, 11:05:28 AM EST
                         He has the power given to him by the Republicans. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (17) - March 4, 2009, 11:42:12 AM EST
                             They're not doing it. - (beepster) - (16) - March 4, 2009, 01:45:52 PM EST
                                 There weren't too many Democrats at CPAC. - (Another Scott) - (15) - March 4, 2009, 02:22:12 PM EST
                                     No I'm not (and d'uh ^^) - (beepster) - (7) - March 4, 2009, 03:20:45 PM EST
                                         Yes you are - (drook) - (6) - March 4, 2009, 03:30:44 PM EST
                                             BS. Pure and simple - (beepster) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:36:33 PM EST
                                                 I'm not talking about the campaign - (drook) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 03:45:12 PM EST
                                                     Why is that such a big deal? - (beepster) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 05:24:08 PM EST
                                                         You seem to be missing the point. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 07:38:48 PM EST
                                                             I'm missing that poiint? - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 10:13:30 PM EST
                                                     And lets look at that apology being spun - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 05:58:43 PM EST
                                     ..nor Father Coughlan; in the '30's: Our Rwanda propagandist - (Ashton) - (6) - March 4, 2009, 03:29:13 PM EST
                                         Aren't I the one oft accused of falling for the ploy du jour - (beepster) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:32:06 PM EST
                                             No one thinks you're dumb enough to fall for it - (drook) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 03:34:34 PM EST
                                                 Me repeating it? - (beepster) - (3) - March 4, 2009, 03:38:48 PM EST
                                                     Was referring to the "frequently accused" line - (drook) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 03:45:01 PM EST
                                                         (Surely you've known for years.. - (Ashton) - March 4, 2009, 03:56:10 PM EST
                                                         What Republican ploy would that be? - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 05:26:34 PM EST
                 And by the way ... - (drook) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:48:20 PM EST
                     They have an option. - (beepster) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 05:31:08 PM EST
                         If that were true . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - March 4, 2009, 09:19:02 PM EST
                             Amenuensis. -NT - (Ashton) - March 4, 2009, 09:48:46 PM EST
                             And again... - (beepster) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 10:11:40 PM EST
                                 For that argument to be valid . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - March 5, 2009, 12:06:28 AM EST

Hmmm...Cucumis sativus...coincidence? I think not.
64 ms