IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Sending a letter is kind of meaningless
especially when it is Rush they are talking about.

Whether you are defending him or not, for you so that it is obvious that they were stretching because he was talking about only one soldier and not trying to undercut all the soldiers who come out against the war is truly unbelievable. The message the right is delivering is that anybody and everybody who doesn't think there is any way to achieve the objectives of the war and that we are doing more harm than good over there is someone who wants America to lose. That comes through very clearly in the transcript.

I don't listen to Rush, but I can read.
Seamus
Expand Edited by Seamus Oct. 4, 2007, 09:56:24 AM EDT
New Regardless.
It appeared from what I read that he was dealing with the likes of the true fake...but I understand the broad brush thinking too. Its not really the point.

In fact, its more to my point if one thinks it was a slam against every soldier.

A vote of the kind done on moveon is also pretty meaningless. But it seems to get alot of people fired up around here.
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
New Re: Regardless.
IMO, anyone with any experience with Rush picks up on what he does and how he operates. And I don't see how the fact that Rush was talking out more than just the one soldier affects your point one way or the other.

Same with the dems. AFAICS, everyone on the right knows the dems don't have the stomach to consistently use the same tactics as the right does. Let alone with the same veracity. Using tactics like the letter is, not currently, a part of their main arsenal. It is not effective and that is why people ignore it. Its just not worth arguing about something that meaningless, especially when the other side ignores it. If it doesn't work and doesn't generate any attention, they may stop doing it.

The right, on the other hand, are very skilled at turning things like the moveon.org ad into their own sound bite. They did that by successfully re-framing the ad and making it a big deal. You had the same view point. The only thing I took exception to was the flawed logic you used to prove your point.

Seamus
     Hrm. Wonder why this hasn't been posted yet - (bepatient) - (22)
         Guess we have better things to do -NT - (imqwerky)
         Why should it be? - (crazy) - (16)
             I thought that only - (bepatient) - (15)
                 It is dumb to play that game with the republicans - (Seamus) - (7)
                     It appears to me - (bepatient) - (6)
                         That is the way he operates - (Seamus) - (5)
                             Regular listener then? - (bepatient) - (4)
                                 Nope - (Seamus) - (3)
                                     So he needs to be studied? - (bepatient) - (2)
                                         Yes, of course he does. - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                             Another regular listener. -NT - (bepatient)
                 Wrong on two counts. (Oh, look, that's all of them!) - (CRConrad) - (6)
                     I equate the 2 acts - (bepatient) - (5)
                         Sending a letter is kind of meaningless - (Seamus) - (2)
                             Regardless. - (bepatient) - (1)
                                 Re: Regardless. - (Seamus)
                         CENSORSHIP - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                             Re: CENSORSHIP - (bepatient)
         It is the Democrat response to the MoveOn ad - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
             Fair and Balanced - (bepatient)
         Probably cause - (Simon_Jester)
         But, since we're POSTing Rush... - (Simon_Jester)

Powered by orbiting brain lasers!
50 ms