IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / News Picks Forum / But according to the prior definition...
Post #26,984
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
2/2/02 12:43:36 PM
Reply
New But according to the prior definition...
...none of those kids would survive on a desert island alone...

so, to extend, she did nothing wrong at all...just her choice.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Post #27,005
by Ashton
2/2/02 4:38:36 PM
Reply
New Sheesh BeeP.
Scott writes a thoughtful and intelligent analysis and you.. riposte with a smarmy marlowesque piece of doggerel?

Now that's not even Econ-level. OK - maybe the Enron heresy has put you off your feed; seein all them market principles shredded into illegibility and bleedin.. could cause a bit of gall-bladder trouble (?)





:-\ufffd
Post #27,017
by Brandioch
2/2/02 6:15:20 PM
Reply
New You're confused, again.
You're applying a marlowe "definition"
-to-
an analysis of a different situation by Scott

Now, if you had applied marlowe's "definition"
-to-
an analysis of a different sittuation BY MARLOWE
-then-
you would have been correct.

Otherwise, you must FIRST ascertain whether Scott endorses Marlowe's "definition".
-then-
You can point out where they cross.

And I have to point this out to an adult.....because?
Post #27,086
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
2/3/02 2:57:37 PM
Reply
New no, i'm not
now you seem to have the 2 post prior problem.

I responded to Marlowes "right to life" definition.

Scott gave a rather eloquent dissertation on the case in Texas I referenced in my earlier post. I then clarified...becuase using the texas example was questionable due to the womans sanity.

I clarified my earlier post to Marlowe.

Keep up
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Post #27,094
by Brandioch
2/3/02 4:25:11 PM
Reply
New Hmmm, my monitor must be broken, then.
You see, in my display, your post seems to be in reply to Scott's.

But you say you're replying to Marlowe?

You say that you're clarifying your post to Marlowe?

By replying to Scott's post?

But Scott's post was in reply to your post that was in reply to Marlowe's post.

Brandioch
Marlowe
Tony
Marlowe
Bill
Scott
Bill (But according to the prior definition...)
Brandioch
Bill
Brandioch (this post)

Ummmm, no. You were applying Marlowe's definition to Scott's post.

Especially when your "post" consisted of:

"...none of those kids would survive on a desert island alone..."
-and-
"so, to extend, she did nothing wrong at all...just her choice."

Now, your "desert island" phrasing seems to be a paraphrase of Marlowe's:
"If you can survive on a desert island without any help from other human beings, then you have a right to life."

Which just leaves:
"so, to extend, she did nothing wrong at all...just her choice."
As your "clarification" of your original post.

And you think that I'm the one that is confused?
Post #27,096
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
2/3/02 4:49:18 PM
Reply
New yep i think your the confused one.
I bet Scott understood.
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
     Fetus reclassified as \ufffdunborn child\ufffd - (Brandioch) - (44) - Jan. 31, 2002, 03:49:45 PM EST
         interesting you have to be a US citizen to be eligble - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2002, 03:55:41 PM EST
             Not all the time - (nking) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:29:24 PM EST
         Rowe vs. Wade - (nking) - (4) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:27:15 PM EST
             Drinking alcohol during pregnancy? - (Brandioch) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:39:54 PM EST
                 Some women do it anyway - (nking) - Jan. 31, 2002, 06:49:42 PM EST
             I believe 'retrospective abortion' is the term :) - (Meerkat) - Jan. 31, 2002, 10:33:39 PM EST
             It is ROE versus Wade - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 1, 2002, 12:13:03 PM EST
         Birth of 'The United Sanctified States' imminent? - (Ashton) - Feb. 1, 2002, 01:10:11 AM EST
         Wheat and corn reclassifed as "pre-digested crap" - (Silverlock) - (7) - Feb. 1, 2002, 08:33:56 AM EST
             Baby==crap? Assholes? My, my. Such black thoughts. - (marlowe) - (6) - Feb. 1, 2002, 01:31:25 PM EST
                 That acerbic wit just slays me. - (Silverlock) - (5) - Feb. 1, 2002, 02:31:16 PM EST
                     A simple "you win again" would have sufficed. -NT - (marlowe) - (4) - Feb. 2, 2002, 09:52:43 AM EST
                         Well then, why didn't you say so before? Thanks! -NT - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2002, 08:42:43 AM EST
                             You ruminated for two days, and came up with this? -NT - (marlowe) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2002, 10:25:01 AM EST
                                 Nah, couple seconds. I stay away from here on weekends. -NT - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2002, 10:30:04 AM EST
                                     Okay, fair enough. But couldn't you have tried harder? - (marlowe) - Feb. 4, 2002, 01:04:16 PM EST
         As opposed to a born child? - (marlowe) - (27) - Feb. 1, 2002, 01:19:14 PM EST
             Yes. I was. - (Brandioch) - (26) - Feb. 1, 2002, 06:45:37 PM EST
                 OK, so why can't we abort you? - (tonytib) - (25) - Feb. 1, 2002, 09:36:48 PM EST
                     *Masturbation Murderers*___or:___ Logic is such sterile fun. - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2002, 12:18:00 AM EST
                     Is he an independently viable life form? - (marlowe) - (9) - Feb. 2, 2002, 09:51:18 AM EST
                         Wow... - (bepatient) - (7) - Feb. 2, 2002, 09:55:34 AM EST
                             Should Andrea Yates get the death penalty? I don't think so. - (Another Scott) - (6) - Feb. 2, 2002, 11:27:21 AM EST
                                 But according to the prior definition... - (bepatient) - (5) - Feb. 2, 2002, 12:43:36 PM EST
                                     Sheesh BeeP. - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2002, 04:38:36 PM EST
                                     You're confused, again. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 2, 2002, 06:15:20 PM EST
                                         no, i'm not - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2002, 02:57:37 PM EST
                                             Hmmm, my monitor must be broken, then. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2002, 04:25:11 PM EST
                                                 yep i think your the confused one. - (bepatient) - Feb. 3, 2002, 04:49:18 PM EST
                         thanks...you got my point -NT - (tonytib) - Feb. 2, 2002, 03:55:28 PM EST
                     lingwage ez eeeeeezeeeeee. - (Brandioch) - (13) - Feb. 2, 2002, 06:08:47 PM EST
                         Yeah, it's so easy.....you can't even get it right! - (tonytib) - (5) - Feb. 3, 2002, 12:58:24 PM EST
                             Sure, just re-classify me. - (Brandioch) - (4) - Feb. 3, 2002, 04:14:50 PM EST
                                 But you're NOT viable on your own -NT - (tonytib) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2002, 09:06:09 PM EST
                                     WTF are you gibbering about, Tone??? -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2002, 01:53:43 AM EST
                                         LRPD: "Smoke the pipe, and there will be no lies between us" -NT - (Ashton) - Feb. 4, 2002, 01:59:06 AM EST
                                     Is this going to be another "definition"? - (Brandioch) - Feb. 4, 2002, 11:09:28 AM EST
                         If I abort you - (boxley) - Feb. 3, 2002, 01:34:34 PM EST
                         Anyone want to answer this? - (Brandioch) - (5) - Feb. 3, 2002, 04:37:43 PM EST
                             you are discussing the legality - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 4, 2002, 10:58:28 AM EST
                                 Either way. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2002, 11:07:53 AM EST
                                     eh, scraping with knives works both ways? - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2002, 11:26:29 AM EST
                                         *sigh* - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2002, 03:21:14 PM EST
                                             point==taken -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 5, 2002, 10:50:30 AM EST

The tautological prime conjecture states that the tautological prime conjecture is true.
102 ms