That is why I said in theory. The difference is that when the government manipulates science to get the answers it wants, it is recognized as wrong. When the corporations do the same thing, it is considered a good use of the advertising budget.
Jay
BullGore the Movie
- (boxley)
- (14)
- June 14, 2006, 07:10:41 PM EDT
No attack from me.
- (ben_tilly)
- (8)
- June 14, 2006, 08:08:34 PM EDT
was refering to the eurogogs :-)
-NT
- (boxley)
- June 14, 2006, 08:22:44 PM EDT
Gah, read slashdot on this
- (ben_tilly)
- (6)
- June 14, 2006, 08:30:20 PM EDT
oh, and who pays for the co2 advocates?
- (boxley)
- (5)
- June 14, 2006, 10:09:26 PM EDT
Nobody is free of self-interest
- (JayMehaffey)
- (4)
- June 14, 2006, 10:37:40 PM EDT
who directs government scientists? Politicians
- (boxley)
- (3)
- June 14, 2006, 10:49:51 PM EDT
Not quite.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- June 14, 2006, 11:38:31 PM EDT
BLM in Alaska re-writing biology reports to suit the admin
- (boxley)
- June 15, 2006, 08:50:53 AM EDT
That is why I said in theory
- (JayMehaffey)
- June 15, 2006, 09:23:10 AM EDT
Canada Free Press is most definitely not CP
- (jake123)
- June 14, 2006, 09:29:35 PM EDT
A less biased source of information.
- (Another Scott)
- (3)
- June 14, 2006, 11:18:55 PM EDT
point, what is the percentage of man made c02 releases
- (boxley)
- (2)
- June 14, 2006, 11:22:17 PM EDT
Let's see... 45 kB images.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- June 15, 2006, 12:16:43 AM EDT
Mount st Helens was 02.% ?
-NT
- (boxley)
- June 15, 2006, 08:52:16 AM EDT