The reason to break netscape away from AOL is to seperate the browser from web content and restore netscape as a standalone company as they were before MS destroyed them. The fact that this punishes MS for their crimes is a side-affect (a rather good one :-) ). The real goal here is to compensate netscape for damages.
If IE is dumped (from WinXP and forward, and new development stopped) in favor of netscape (has better support for standards), are the consumers really harmed?
There is no "lock" to use win32 api calls on linux, only to use MS products on a free operating system. This DOES help! Quite a bit in fact. Just think if the vendors can preinstall linux (a free, stable OS) with either staroffice or "Wine and MS office", at the choice of the users. MS would no longer be able to control the vendors using the OS monopoly to get into other markets. At least MS would not get paid for the OS if the user doesn't want it. If nothing else, it would give the users a choice of OS to use, in case they insist on using MS office.
You said the timeframe is not good enough. What do you mean by that? Which timeframe and why?