Heh.

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #2,402 by admin 7/19/01 9:46:21 PM Reply	Heh. BrowserCo would be free to merge with or acquire other companies at any time. Or, perhaps, get bought by someone like IBM or Sun? :-) Regards, -scott anderson
Post #2,403 by imric 7/19/01 9:53:08 PM Reply	AOL. Imric's Tips for Living Paranoia Is a Survival Trait Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
Post #2,413 by inthane-chan 7/20/01 12:20:49 AM Reply	I bloody well hope not! An unholy combination if I ever saw one... And AOL COULD force browser choice, not just on AOL itself, but the Time-Warner cable modem network as well. Icky.
Post #2,534 by static 7/21/01 1:36:15 AM Reply	I doubt they would. Sure, I would be surprised if they didn't think about it, but since AOL currently owns Netscape, then the term Browser Monopoly would have a nice threatening ring to it... Wade. "All around me are nothing but fakes Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"

Re-opening the Possible Remedies argument. - (static) - (21) - July 19, 2001, 09:19:47 PM EDT

Heh. - (admin) - (3) - July 19, 2001, 09:46:21 PM EDT

AOL. -NT - (imric) - (2) - July 19, 2001, 09:53:08 PM EDT

I bloody well hope not! - (inthane-chan) - (1) - July 20, 2001, 12:20:49 AM EDT

I doubt they would. - (static) - July 21, 2001, 01:36:15 AM EDT

To what end? Dave touches on this, but... - (Another Scott) - (16) - July 20, 2001, 07:26:28 AM EDT

In order to restore competition... - (Don) - (10) - July 20, 2001, 01:22:04 PM EDT

I think we should nuke them from orbit. It's the only way... - (jake123) - (1) - July 20, 2001, 01:35:41 PM EDT

I said that. -NT - (Ashton) - July 21, 2001, 12:02:19 AM EDT

Can't do that. - (addison) - (7) - July 20, 2001, 03:02:43 PM EDT

Why not? - (Don) - (6) - July 21, 2001, 03:08:47 AM EDT

Because its illegal? - (addison) - (5) - July 21, 2001, 01:42:49 PM EDT

which part is "illegal"? - (Don) - (3) - Aug. 1, 2001, 04:47:44 AM EDT

Most of it. - (addison) - (2) - Aug. 1, 2001, 10:35:36 AM EDT

Perhaps all these points underscore the need for - (Ashton) - Aug. 2, 2001, 06:11:11 PM EDT

You keep missing the point re: linux - (Don) - Aug. 2, 2001, 07:37:58 PM EDT

Info : Excerpt from IE's "About" Box - (pwhysall) - Aug. 3, 2001, 02:53:18 AM EDT

It's a risky move, undoubtedly. - (static) - (4) - July 21, 2001, 01:56:45 AM EDT

Agree, and Disagree - (jb4) - (3) - July 24, 2001, 02:09:54 PM EDT

Trying to do that creates a bigger problem. - (static) - (1) - July 25, 2001, 11:04:44 PM EDT

We've heard many suggestions re the dilemma by now. - (Ashton) - July 25, 2001, 11:32:29 PM EDT

Trying to do that creates a bigger problem. - (static) - July 25, 2001, 11:04:44 PM EDT

The website with matched socks.
95 ms