Welcome to IWETHEY!
Post #238,056
12/14/05 6:07:44 PM
12/14/05 9:45:56 PM
|
Okay, about what I thought
Though I had no idea the travelling salesman got so hard so fast.
Wait, that didn't come out right.
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
Edited by drewk
Dec. 14, 2005, 09:45:56 PM EST
Okay, about what I thought
Though I had no idea the travelling salesman got so hard so fast.
Wait, that didn't some out right.
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #238,065
12/14/05 7:18:01 PM
|
Not only hard
but rilly rilly big too.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Need to QC an active linux box.
- (
broomberg)
- (20)
- Dec. 8, 2005, 09:31:32 PM EST
My guess would be handles
- (
jake123)
- (18)
- Dec. 8, 2005, 09:38:30 PM EST
How can an external process tell?
-NT
- (
broomberg)
- (17)
- Dec. 8, 2005, 09:54:04 PM EST
AFAIK, it can't.
- (
jake123)
- (16)
- Dec. 9, 2005, 01:25:33 AM EST
Erm?
- (
jb4)
- (15)
- Dec. 9, 2005, 02:07:09 PM EST
No, not necessarily.
- (
jake123)
- (14)
- Dec. 9, 2005, 02:20:12 PM EST
And not necessarily again
- (
ben_tilly)
- (13)
- Dec. 9, 2005, 02:44:21 PM EST
A) Thanks. B) Harrumph!
- (
jb4)
- (12)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 03:08:54 PM EST
Well, of course you need disciplined programming
- (
jake123)
- (8)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 04:36:04 PM EST
Stupid "never took a CS course" question
- (
drewk)
- (7)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 05:06:08 PM EST
If you have to iterate over every possible combination
- (
jake123)
- (6)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 05:36:08 PM EST
I like your answer! (Esp. the 1st sentence...)
-NT
- (
jb4)
- (1)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 06:02:38 PM EST
Well, it's not like it's not true...
- (
jake123)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 07:16:34 PM EST
Okay, about what I thought
- (
drewk)
- (1)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 09:45:56 PM EST
Not only hard
- (
jake123)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 07:18:01 PM EST
You overstate the case significantly
- (
ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 10:00:28 PM EST
Yeah, that's true
- (
jake123)
- Dec. 15, 2005, 12:02:27 AM EST
Disciplined programming, eh?
- (
pwhysall)
- (2)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 05:16:25 PM EST
Sounds like you may never have heard of it?
-NT
- (
jb4)
- (1)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 06:03:15 PM EST
Nah, just that I've rarely *seen* it
-NT
- (
drewk)
- Dec. 14, 2005, 06:08:34 PM EST
do a netstat -a | grep -i waiting
- (
boxley)
- Dec. 8, 2005, 10:11:14 PM EST
Remember, people in 1900 didn't know what an atom was. They didn't know its structure.
They also didn't know what a radio was, or an airport, or a movie, or a television, or a computer, or a cell phone, or a jet, an antibiotic, a rocket, a satellite, an MRI, ICU, IUD, IBM, IRA, ERA, EEG, EPA, IRS, DOD, PCP, HTML, internet. interferon, instant replay, remote sensing, remote control, speed dialing, gene therapy, gene splicing, genes, spot welding, heat-seeking, bipolar, prozac, leotards, lap dancing, email, tape recorder, CDs, airbags, plastic explosive, plastic, robots, cars, liposuction, transduction, superconduction, dish antennas, step aerobics, smoothies, twelve-step, ultrasound, nylon, rayon, teflon, fiber optics, carpal tunnel, laser surgery, laparoscopy, corneal transplant, kidney transplant, AIDS... None of this would have meant anything to a person in the year 1900. They wouldn't know what you are talking about.
290 ms