IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New That's a changin'.
3 Dual Xeon Dell boxen, and (if approved) an x365 quad and an x445 quad.
bcnu,
Mikem

Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
God Bless America.
New well ibm stuff works best with ibm stuff in my opinion
but a better price at almost as good would let me look at emc products
thanx,
bill
All tribal myths are true, for a given value of "true" Terry Pratchett
[link|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/|http://boxleys.blogspot.com/]

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 48 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New That's what I was thinking too. Thanks.
bcnu,
Mikem

Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
God Bless America.
New I argue both sides of this.
Yes, IBM does (mostly) work best with other IBM stuff.

There are certain areas where IBM just doesn't quite grasp the whole picture yet, prolly never will.

I won't hesitate to use 100% IBM, but that is because they do such great and thorough jobs at "Deals" and Kits.

Where I draw the line, is when things in IBM are fixed with a hack in the OS Department and a Bad soldering job on the "hardware" end of the problem. Rather than just fix the real problem.

When I begin to see this, I call the bluff. Sometimes IBM bawks at a balk. If that happens, EMC gets a call.

If IBM fesses up, they get much berth to fix the problems. If they don't show honest efforts, I start scheduling sales people to show up during the time the engineers are around trying to fix the problems.

It is amazing how much sway an engineer can have with a company sometimes.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
[image|http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg||||]
     SAN Recommendations? - (mmoffitt) - (25)
         what kind of boxen will you be hooking up? - (boxley) - (4)
             That's a changin'. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                 well ibm stuff works best with ibm stuff in my opinion - (boxley) - (2)
                     That's what I was thinking too. Thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                     I argue both sides of this. - (folkert)
         Naive question - Would NAS be sufficient? - (Another Scott) - (6)
             Not for our application. - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                 What's the difference between SAN and NAS? -NT - (jbrabeck) - (4)
                     dyslexia? -NT - (SpiceWare)
                     Short answer: Lots of money. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                         s/FDDI/Fibre Channel/ -NT - (broomberg)
                         Thank you - (jbrabeck)
         That the Shark 2? Or What ever they call it now? - (folkert) - (12)
             Ya know, with all that ranting - - (broomberg) - (4)
                 You know me... - (folkert)
                 Stab at answers. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                     Have you been pitched a configuration with a price yet? - (broomberg)
                     x445? - (broomberg)
             How do fail rates between SATA and SCSI compare? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                 Too soon - (broomberg) - (5)
                     Yes, Typo, sorry. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                         Here's what I did. - (broomberg) - (3)
                             What'd you end up with? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                 I think an EMC Clairion. -NT - (folkert)
                                 2 of these - (broomberg)

Not even for a Scooby Snack...?
97 ms