Ashcroft wants to withhold names of detainees - (marlowe) - (16) - Nov. 26, 2001, 05:26:28 PM EST
         Well, this is fscking ingenious! - (jb4) - (3) - Nov. 26, 2001, 06:46:24 PM EST
             Agreed on habeus corpus. - (a6l6e6x) - Nov. 26, 2001, 08:57:52 PM EST
             I was thinking of this the other day. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 30, 2001, 10:14:20 AM EST
                 (Nice sig...wish I knew for sure what the answer is...) -NT - (jb4) - Nov. 30, 2001, 10:29:09 AM EST
         Just to play devil's advocate... - (bbronson) - (11) - Nov. 27, 2001, 10:28:03 AM EST
             Nobody would >ever< resort to #5, right? - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 27, 2001, 11:47:35 AM EST
                 Beep, have you no shame? - (Ashton) - (3) - Nov. 27, 2001, 01:31:04 PM EST
                     None at all... - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 27, 2001, 02:59:20 PM EST
                         Umm OK. I forgot the :-\ufffd - (Ashton) - (1) - Nov. 27, 2001, 03:18:21 PM EST
                             Knew that... - (bepatient) - Nov. 27, 2001, 04:42:29 PM EST
             Sure it's simple... - (jb4) - (4) - Nov. 27, 2001, 01:40:34 PM EST
                 I disagree re: #3, but what about #5? - (bbronson) - (3) - Nov. 27, 2001, 02:22:44 PM EST
                     And #5 is the problem. -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 27, 2001, 02:47:42 PM EST
                     Depends upon how they were "released". - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 27, 2001, 02:54:49 PM EST
                         That last antecedes the Ashcroft Covenant. - (Ashton) - Nov. 27, 2001, 03:57:05 PM EST
             #5 may be a lesser evil... - (marlowe) - Nov. 27, 2001, 06:42:46 PM EST