so rosarche tests are "props?"

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #194,311

by daemon

2/12/05 12:03:01 AM

so rosarche tests are "props?"

they are simply indicators and the "interpretation" can vary from good to bad shrinks and other aiders and abettors. Take a person who has a set of lips that look like a mepps number 7 treble hook and lure would not be out of place and say " I bet you are a pisces" 8 out of ten times you would be right. Its not science, its observation of comparisons over the centuries. Some are better at it than others. I do not claim to know astrology but fish lips are fish lips.
regards,
daemon

I love her dearly, far beyond any creature I've ever known, and I can prove it, for never once in almost seventy years of married life have I taken her by the throat. Mind you, it's been a near thing once or twice.
George Macdonald Frasier
Clearwater highschool marching band [link|http://www.chstornadoband.org/|http://www.chstornadoband.org/]

Spot the flaw in the research - (ben_tilly) - (27) - Feb. 10, 2005, 12:08:10 AM EST

Not what I was thinking - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2005, 01:30:26 AM EST

That flaw is secondary - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 10, 2005, 07:30:38 AM EST

Ummm , why . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (14) - Feb. 10, 2005, 04:16:00 AM EST

"good astrologer" - (pwhysall) - (10) - Feb. 10, 2005, 04:58:35 AM EST

Don't laugh. They exist. I've met some. - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Feb. 10, 2005, 07:29:15 AM EST

I'll reserve judgement, then... - (pwhysall) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2005, 07:38:04 AM EST

Interesting "reserve" - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 10, 2005, 08:42:22 AM EST

A fun one with a card reader. - (Andrew Grygus) - Feb. 10, 2005, 01:27:16 PM EST

Seconded. Again. - (Ashton) - Feb. 10, 2005, 11:06:16 PM EST

So, a good astrologer == a psychologist, with props. -NT - (Meerkat) - (4) - Feb. 11, 2005, 11:02:37 PM EST

Not so much props . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Feb. 11, 2005, 11:22:47 PM EST

Sounds like the I Ching, too. -NT - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 11, 2005, 11:26:06 PM EST

No doubt. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Feb. 12, 2005, 12:35:20 AM EST

so rosarche tests are "props?" - (daemon) - Feb. 12, 2005, 12:03:01 AM EST

Because it was on /.? - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2005, 08:41:11 AM EST

I once had a professor - (bionerd) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2005, 09:40:32 AM EST

Indeed - (Ashton) - Feb. 10, 2005, 11:17:07 PM EST

first off they didnt describe how they came to - (daemon) - (9) - Feb. 10, 2005, 08:16:54 PM EST

I'd consider that fairly obvious - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Feb. 10, 2005, 08:37:47 PM EST

thanks, it is obvious and I missed it :-) -NT - (daemon) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2005, 08:39:08 PM EST

Items daemon can hold in memory < 1 -NT - (drewk) - (6) - Feb. 11, 2005, 12:09:30 PM EST

Not true - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Feb. 11, 2005, 03:56:14 PM EST

Apparently not enough, though. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Feb. 11, 2005, 03:59:34 PM EST

never enough, however I have met Reuben Pecarve - (daemon) - (3) - Feb. 11, 2005, 10:43:57 PM EST

That isn't short-term memory - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 12, 2005, 02:14:47 AM EST

I'm referring to the recent TMI violation... :D -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Feb. 12, 2005, 09:28:12 AM EST

what? A perfect line about cuddling - (daemon) - Feb. 12, 2005, 06:21:32 PM EST

iwethey.org

Why do you ask me? You know I cannot do this thing anymore with the bugs.
71 ms