IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Actually, he didn't say "government".
It's still a separate *country*, isn't it, however "legitimate" or "illegitimate" (or "recognized" or "non-recognized") the *government* is?

Scott:
Only three countries recognized the Taliban as the legitimate government, and one of them, Pakistan, pretty much had to or face troubles with its border and citizens.
But what TT actually wrote, was:
But the fact that the US decided to forego and ignore a legitimate request in every sense of the word by a ruling regime, in an internationally recognized sovereign country, to provide proofs before they (the Taliban) decides what they will do, spoke volume.
and
But once again, US has meddled/taken side/assisted with another sovereign country's INTERNAL dispute.
And the fact remains, it's the *country of Afdghanistan* you're bombing.

Also, it's been two months now since Bush declared bin Laden guilty, and we still haven't seen the proof he didn't deign to show the Taliban. Wasn't that supposed to be, like, forthcoming?
   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything
New Uh, wrong?
What "we" have seen is that after 9/11, the US declared "war on terrorism" and "claimed" that al Qaeda was responsible, and refused the Taliban "legitimate request" for proof of guilt before handling over OBL and at the same time branded the Taliban, then legitimate government of Afghanistan as accomplice and initiate bombing of a sovereign country, allying itself with the NA.
Regards,

-scott anderson
New Ah, OK. Yeah, I missed 1 out of 3 places he mentioned it.
But even so, that request from a *de facto* government doesn't seem all that unreasonable.

Also, my two points remain.
   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything
     Comments? - (TTC) - (32)
         The jubilation of the liberated in afganistan - (boxley) - (26)
             Re: The jubilation of the liberated in afganistan - (TTC) - (23)
                 does that also include the people in Nangking - (boxley)
                 Oh, we've certainly learned something . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (21)
                     Well said and right on, Andrew! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (20)
                         Re: Well said and right on, Andrew! - (TTC) - (19)
                             No, it is a matter of intent. - (Andrew Grygus) - (18)
                                 Re: No, it is a matter of intent. - (TTC) - (17)
                                     Idealistic fantasy - (Andrew Grygus) - (8)
                                         Re: Idealistic fantasy - (TTC) - (6)
                                             False: - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                 Re: False: - (TTC)
                                             We smashed Al-Jazeera station? - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                                                 Re: We smashed Al-Jazeera station? - (TTC) - (1)
                                                     Not a peep from CNN. I am disgusted! -NT - (Arkadiy)
                                             al-Jazeera - (Ashton)
                                         Typical; once again you fsck up otherwise near-perfect post: - (CRConrad)
                                     Legitimate government of Afghanistan? - (admin) - (7)
                                         Ok, "legitimate" might be pushing it... - (TTC) - (3)
                                             UN Representation held by Pres. Rabbani. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                 Also, Rabbani has returned to Kabul. - (a6l6e6x)
                                                 Thanks for the info. -NT - (TTC)
                                         Actually, he didn't say "government". - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                             Uh, wrong? - (admin) - (1)
                                                 Ah, OK. Yeah, I missed 1 out of 3 places he mentioned it. - (CRConrad)
             One thing that I see is that... - (ChrisR) - (1)
                 Yes. - (Andrew Grygus)
         Just cause. Then what? - (Arkadiy)
         He's nuts. - (wharris2)
         Too much sanity to pass muster - (Ashton) - (2)
             That's the second step - (wharris2) - (1)
                 Re: That's the second step - (TTC)

Aim towards the Enemy.
137 ms