A bit light on details

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #185,856

by Arkadiy

12/2/04 4:44:04 PM

A bit light on details

Also, the "will stun" bit so far failed to materialize. Almost a week since the article.

Was it just bad reporting?

--

This guy's ahead of his time! He's using quantum programming methods: in universes where invalid data is passed to this function, it does not return. Thus you are ensured that you will only have valid data after calling it. Optimally you'd destroy the universe on failure, but computers haven't quite advanced to that level yet.

-- [link|http://thedailywtf.com/archive/2004/10/26/2920.aspx|The] Daily WTF

The smell of Napalm this morning - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:18:11 AM EDT

You ever seen Napalm? - (folkert) - Dec. 2, 2004, 04:37:35 PM EST

A bit light on details - (Arkadiy) - Dec. 2, 2004, 04:44:04 PM EST

They'll use plausable denail - (SpiceWare) - (2) - Dec. 2, 2004, 04:53:58 PM EST

A rose by any other name... -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2004, 05:34:08 PM EST

would still have the same chemical composition -NT - (SpiceWare) - Dec. 2, 2004, 06:35:24 PM EST

iwethey.org

My God... that pizza combo is full of stars...!
65 ms