IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Bill accuses others of condescention, divisivness
Post #183,512
by Silverlock
11/8/04 2:06:09 PM
Reply
New Bill accuses others of condescention, divisivness
The projection is quite amusing. All that was missing was accusing them of being dismissive and sarcastic.
-----------------------------------------
How do you convince a Washington Journalist that you're not slapping him in the face?

Tell him you're not.
Post #183,523
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
11/8/04 2:40:02 PM
Reply
New Nope.
But it wouldn't be the same unless you rolled out at least one ad hominem.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
Post #183,549
by tuberculosis
Picture of tuberculosis
11/8/04 3:52:29 PM
Reply
New Bill provides valuable counterpoint
although he sometimes leaves the actual statement of his point as an exercise for the reader.

Kind of like a fortune cookie.


"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them."     --Albert Einstein

"This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses."     --George W. Bush
Post #183,551
by bepatient
Picture of bepatient
11/8/04 3:56:19 PM
Reply
New Sometimes that's on purpose.
and sometimes I spend a couple dozen posts paying the price for it ;-)

If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
     Banning Gay Marriage - (tuberculosis) - (40) - Nov. 8, 2004, 12:51:47 PM EST
         Want to clarify that? - (bepatient) - (39) - Nov. 8, 2004, 12:56:24 PM EST
             That's BS, and you know it - (ben_tilly) - (16) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:11:54 PM EST
                 Man. - (bepatient) - (15) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:26:09 PM EST
                     Bill accuses others of condescention, divisivness - (Silverlock) - (3) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:06:09 PM EST
                         Nope. - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:40:02 PM EST
                         Bill provides valuable counterpoint - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:52:29 PM EST
                             Sometimes that's on purpose. - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 03:56:19 PM EST
                     Where to begin? - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Nov. 8, 2004, 08:35:46 PM EST
                         Yes and no. - (bepatient) - (9) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:13:08 PM EST
                             Can I play? - (drewk) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 10:13:44 PM EST
                                 "Code words" - (bepatient) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:51:57 PM EST
                                     Yup, Brandioch would nail you at the outset.. stead o' in - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2004, 12:29:24 AM EST
                             We part company at the third sentence - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Nov. 8, 2004, 10:47:50 PM EST
                                 And I think you overestimate... - (bepatient) - (4) - Nov. 8, 2004, 11:48:19 PM EST
                                     And here's my belief - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:17:26 PM EST
                                         To what end? - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2004, 05:59:47 PM EST
                                             Benefits and obligations go hand in hand - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 07:59:43 PM EST
                                                 We both agree... - (bepatient) - Nov. 10, 2004, 02:26:19 PM EST
             OK - (tuberculosis) - (21) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:20:29 PM EST
                 Better. - (bepatient) - (7) - Nov. 8, 2004, 01:33:12 PM EST
                     That sentence is too long - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:29:33 PM EST
                         Thats a universal -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 8, 2004, 02:39:05 PM EST
                     Marriage should be meaningless then... - (xtensive) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:42:11 PM EST
                         This, I agree with. -NT - (imric) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:50:21 PM EST
                     Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway. - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:51:25 PM EST
                         Re: Shrug...they'll lose in the end anyway. - (Yendor) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 09:10:31 AM EST
                             Sorry for the delay.... - (Simon_Jester) - Nov. 22, 2004, 10:30:09 PM EST
                 I would vote against that - (daemon) - (12) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:25:26 PM EST
                     Why should I care that *you* were married in a courthouse? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:28:39 PM EST
                         I wasnt, I dont beleive in state marriages for anyone, -NT - (daemon) - Nov. 8, 2004, 05:34:25 PM EST
                     We've been down this road before - (ben_tilly) - (9) - Nov. 8, 2004, 09:05:12 PM EST
                         married by Ashton Brown would suffice - (daemon) - (8) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:04:19 AM EST
                             Speaking of Ashton... (new thread) - (Nightowl) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:09:20 AM EST
                             more I think about it the more - (daemon) - (5) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:12:53 AM EST
                                 In which case... - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Nov. 9, 2004, 12:12:45 PM EST
                                     already said that a couple of posts up :-) -NT - (daemon) - Nov. 9, 2004, 01:24:28 PM EST
                                     Re: In which case... - (CraigB) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2004, 06:56:02 PM EST
                                         It could always be made more complicated. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2004, 07:40:16 PM EST
                                             This fine Human suggestion is____entirely too___*sane* - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2004, 01:10:01 AM EST
                             As a Reverend in the Universal Life Church - (Ashton) - Nov. 12, 2004, 01:02:14 AM EST

Where's my rapid fire?
72 ms