Nope PXE is really needed now a days...
Many large entrerprises and many larger companies use PXE to update machines during off hours.
If the machine is on... they force it to reboot... otherwise they wake with a wake-on-lan packet. The PXE then requests... a small execution environment checks to see what is scheduled to do and if nothing, goes back to sleep. If things need to be done... well it does em.
Novell uses a small linux partition to do all the work along with a Multicast server for LARGE re-imaging tasks. They then use NAL (Novell Application Imager/Launcher) now just called Application Launcher.
MS uses... err well, SMS (Still???) and automated self installs. Except usually MS has to have bootable media in a drive to make it work.
There are *MANY* other reasons to have a Network Boot as well. thin/diskless clients (making a comeback in companies)
So, maybe you should stop with the sarcasm and overall pessimism... I was making fun of Petre.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @
iwetheyNo matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]