Re: Mono?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #167,771

8/5/04 5:42:11 PM

8/5/04 5:48:12 PM

Re: Mono?

Mono is C# only right now. There is mention of VB.Net support for a future version.

Mono doesn't have WinForms support right now. There is also mention of basic support for that in the next Mono version. WinForms is what you would use to create .NET Windows client apps.

And from the Oracle ADO.net Provider (what you would use to access the DB in .Net) status page: "Lots of missing functionality and bugs."

Why do you want to use Mono over the official MS .NET (besides the usual "MS made it so it must suck")?

--
Chris Altmann

Edited by altmann Aug. 5, 2004, 05:48:12 PM EDT

Expand All History

Mono? - (broomberg) - (33) - Aug. 5, 2004, 12:21:57 AM EDT

Why not Delphi in stead? (And Kylix in stead of Mono.) -NT - (CRConrad) - (19) - Aug. 5, 2004, 06:09:33 AM EDT

It's dead - (broomberg) - (18) - Aug. 5, 2004, 10:10:14 AM EDT

Those words may come back to haunt you... ;-) - (admin) - Aug. 5, 2004, 10:28:20 AM EDT

Re: It's dead - (deSitter) - (3) - Aug. 5, 2004, 10:30:07 AM EDT

Ahhh...ahhhh....ahhh.....aychoochtml -NT - (FuManChu) - Aug. 5, 2004, 12:28:09 PM EDT

We discussed both - (broomberg) - (1) - Aug. 5, 2004, 01:44:55 PM EDT

Acrobat forms = javascript - (deSitter) - Aug. 5, 2004, 02:00:36 PM EDT

That would indicate (to the savvy manager, at least)... - (jb4) - (1) - Aug. 5, 2004, 02:02:59 PM EDT

Different levels of noise - (broomberg) - Aug. 5, 2004, 02:30:57 PM EDT

The glimpses you provide into corporate decision making - (tuberculosis) - (10) - Aug. 5, 2004, 06:05:58 PM EDT

Re: The glimpses you provide into corporate decision making - (deSitter) - (8) - Aug. 5, 2004, 06:09:52 PM EDT

I don't think it has to work that way - (tuberculosis) - (7) - Aug. 5, 2004, 08:48:25 PM EDT

Huh? - (broomberg) - (6) - Aug. 5, 2004, 09:00:24 PM EDT

Its a lot easier to teach a programmer business than - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Aug. 5, 2004, 10:02:09 PM EDT

"Conventional" is there for a reason - (broomberg) - (4) - Aug. 5, 2004, 10:30:04 PM EDT

I object to your characterization - (tuberculosis) - (3) - Aug. 5, 2004, 11:04:39 PM EDT

No, but you'll take a chance on an - (broomberg) - (2) - Aug. 6, 2004, 12:08:05 AM EDT

If I were you - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Aug. 6, 2004, 12:18:38 AM EDT

Done - (broomberg) - Aug. 6, 2004, 06:39:31 AM EDT

Sorry - (broomberg) - Aug. 5, 2004, 06:35:30 PM EDT

Mono will be more... - (folkert) - (6) - Aug. 5, 2004, 11:43:50 AM EDT

To paraphrase: "Mono. a better .NET than .NET" - (jb4) - (5) - Aug. 5, 2004, 02:05:22 PM EDT

You like? Yeah, wow, great - just look how that helped OS/2! -NT - (CRConrad) - (4) - Aug. 6, 2004, 05:28:54 AM EDT

What?!? "A better OS2 than OS2"? - (jb4) - (3) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:18:20 PM EDT

Windows 3.1 -> WinOS2 -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2004, 03:22:13 PM EDT

OT: Remember MS Sql Server running on OS/2? - (mmoffitt) - Aug. 12, 2004, 10:31:14 PM EDT

No, you nitwit, the other way around! - (CRConrad) - Aug. 13, 2004, 06:37:32 AM EDT

snoball for a front end? - (boxley) - Aug. 5, 2004, 02:18:07 PM EDT

Re: Mono? - (altmann) - Aug. 5, 2004, 05:48:12 PM EDT

I'm confused. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Aug. 5, 2004, 06:03:55 PM EDT

Very observant - (broomberg) - (2) - Aug. 5, 2004, 06:41:33 PM EDT

Suggestion - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Aug. 5, 2004, 07:46:37 PM EDT

Hmm. - (broomberg) - Aug. 5, 2004, 07:48:22 PM EDT

'Cause the music rules.
106 ms