Post #165,319
7/21/04 10:33:59 AM
|
I have no interest in any of that *either*
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #165,323
7/21/04 10:48:25 AM
|
Acker Bilk and Frederick Forsyth, right?
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #165,337
7/21/04 11:04:45 AM
|
wrong x 2
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #165,344
7/21/04 11:10:25 AM
|
James Last and Wilbur Smith?
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #165,363
7/21/04 12:20:52 PM
|
If this was baseball...
you'd have struck out multiple times by now.
Lemme give some answers that are more to my taste.
Kate Bush and Peter S. Beagle Karen Matheson and Steven Brust Andy Stewart and Megan Lindholm Janis Ian and George Martin
Oh, and yes, I do listen to Elton John. Voluntarily. :-P
Cheers, Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #165,365
7/21/04 12:29:38 PM
|
pre- or post-Taupin?
-drl
|
Post #165,392
7/21/04 1:36:13 PM
|
Both
I actually don't have much Elton John, but I know that it annoys Peter that I don't detest him. ;-)
Cheers, Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|
Post #165,404
7/21/04 2:21:14 PM
|
I'm a ROCK-IT-MAN!
You haven't heard Elton John until you've heard William Shatner butcher it.
WANTED: Precognitive Telepath for adventuring Partnership. You know where to apply.
|
Post #165,418
7/21/04 3:17:40 PM
|
WOOOSH!
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #165,520
7/22/04 2:49:56 AM
|
Assuming "George Martin" means George "Rolls-Royce" Martin..
..that would leave "Peter S. Beagle" for me to check out.
(Oh, and why wasn't Robin Hobb included in your list? ;-)
[link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad] (I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]
|
Post #165,622
7/22/04 2:36:18 PM
|
Yup, yup, and you already know ;-)
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
|