Even with WEP on...

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #161,466 by Yendor 6/24/04 3:16:26 PM Reply	Even with WEP on... ...It's basically a borked protocol. Anyone with about 30 minutes and some automated tools can break WEP encryption just by sniffing the packets. Just something to keep in mind. -YendorMike [link\|http://www.hope-ride.org/\|http://www.hope-ride.org/]
Post #161,475 by deSitter 6/24/04 3:34:37 PM Reply	128bit? Hmm -drl
Post #161,478 by pwhysall 6/24/04 3:37:49 PM Reply	Would you say it's sufficient for domestic use, though? I think it probably is. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #161,493 by Yendor 6/24/04 4:20:32 PM Reply	He specified for business use, however. I use it often at my house. Hell, I haven't even turned WEP on. I really don't much care. But business != home. -YendorMike [link\|http://www.hope-ride.org/\|http://www.hope-ride.org/]
Post #161,495 by pwhysall 6/24/04 4:27:50 PM Reply	Nod. I should read for comprehension. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]

Linksys wireless security - (broomberg) - (6) - June 24, 2004, 02:34:34 PM EDT

Even with WEP on... - (Yendor) - (4) - June 24, 2004, 03:16:26 PM EDT

128bit? Hmm -NT - (deSitter) - June 24, 2004, 03:34:37 PM EDT

Would you say it's sufficient for domestic use, though? - (pwhysall) - (2) - June 24, 2004, 03:37:49 PM EDT

He specified for business use, however. - (Yendor) - (1) - June 24, 2004, 04:20:32 PM EDT

Nod. I should read for comprehension. -NT - (pwhysall) - June 24, 2004, 04:27:50 PM EDT

Re: Linksys wireless security - (Steven A S) - Aug. 13, 2004, 02:42:03 PM EDT

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...
69 ms