Shouldn't kernel 2.6 be faster than 2.4? - (drewk) - (19) - June 15, 2004, 12:28:38 AM EDT
         Odd. Faster here... -NT - (imric) - June 15, 2004, 06:26:08 AM EDT
         Depends. - (folkert) - (12) - June 15, 2004, 10:16:56 AM EDT
             Heh, you think? -NT - (drewk) - (2) - June 15, 2004, 10:39:41 AM EDT
                 Perhaps you need to kill all the *IDLE* processes? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - June 15, 2004, 01:54:49 PM EDT
                     And now, I shall SHUN you a second time -NT - (drewk) - June 15, 2004, 03:16:45 PM EDT
             Just did lsmod ... *way* too much running - (drewk) - (8) - June 16, 2004, 10:42:53 PM EDT
                 Personally: - (folkert) - (7) - June 17, 2004, 02:30:49 PM EDT
                     Dupe, ignore. - (pwhysall) - June 17, 2004, 02:56:08 PM EDT
                     feh - (pwhysall) - (5) - June 17, 2004, 02:55:01 PM EDT
                         Welcome to we-be-a-ninnie. - (folkert) - (4) - June 17, 2004, 07:04:20 PM EDT
                             Er, never. Why? -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - June 18, 2004, 01:40:59 AM EDT
                                 ... - (folkert) - (2) - June 18, 2004, 08:56:36 AM EDT
                                     You're thinking of someone else. - (pwhysall) - (1) - June 19, 2004, 06:06:20 AM EDT
                                         That explains it... - (folkert) - June 19, 2004, 06:01:04 PM EDT
         Still slow as hell booting, and even worse opening apps - (drewk) - (4) - June 15, 2004, 09:35:21 PM EDT
             Are you sure you are using hdparm yet? - (folkert) - (3) - June 16, 2004, 08:56:07 PM EDT
                 Mine, the whole file is commented out - (drewk) - (2) - June 16, 2004, 10:11:00 PM EDT
                     Here is what I use... - (folkert) - (1) - June 17, 2004, 08:10:46 AM EDT
                         So that command shows what the drive supports? - (drewk) - June 17, 2004, 10:00:35 AM EDT