IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Point missed, relative size or no:
This is small, not so small, and normal.

It's just there to tease you, Ashton.

Actually, it's not that -2 doesn't work... it's that the text for post content is made smaller - the size of -1. So your small text, while just as small as it is in preview, isn't as small relative to the "normal" content text.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Expand Edited by admin May 13, 2004, 10:29:53 PM EDT
New Ah OK.. let's see what "-3" does with a [bias = -1]
This makes you appear so much lesser.
ie
This makes you appear so much {font color="black" size=-3}lesser.{/font} with the usual '/<>'s.

92U235


Edit.. hmmm - still seems to be an asymptote, and not an increment.
Edit2.. even Worse with (-3).

You may say (re broccoli) it's spinach! and the hell with it..
I say - the sucker's Broken. Still.
Expand Edited by Ashton May 14, 2004, 06:48:04 AM EDT
Expand Edited by Ashton May 14, 2004, 06:51:20 AM EDT
     W.T.F. don't smaller-type sizes work anymore? - (Ashton) - (8)
         Re: W.T.F. don't smaller-type sizes work anymore? - (pwhysall)
         WTH are you saying? - (folkert) - (6)
             Font size 3 gives font size 3 :-) -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                 Fix-eded it. -NT - (folkert)
             Point missed, relative size or no: - (Ashton) - (3)
                 Re: Point missed, relative size or no: - (admin) - (1)
                     Ah OK.. let's see what "-3" does with a [bias = -1] - (Ashton)
                 Okay... Now you have me at a loss. - (folkert)

I turned to him, I said, "A-balone. You're just being shellfish." Well, I knew it was going to be trouble and so did Gill, who was already on the phone to the cods.
132 ms