Post #154,972
5/13/04 11:40:23 AM
5/13/04 11:59:59 AM
|
WTH are you saying?
<font size=1>Font size 1</font> gives Font size 1
<font size=2>Font size 2</font> gives Font size 2
<font size=3>Font size 3</font> gives Font size 3
<font size=4>Font size 4</font> gives Font size 4
<font size=5>Font size 5</font> gives Font size 5
<font size=6>Font size 6</font> gives Font size 6
<font size=7>Font size 7</font> gives Font size 7
I guess the default here is size 3.
Which means the smallest realative change you can make is "-2"
<font size="-2">Font size X</font> gives Font size 1
And the largest relative change would be "+4"
<font size="+4">Font size X</font> gives Font size 7
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute.
Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
Edited by folkert
May 13, 2004, 11:59:59 AM EDT
|
Post #154,975
5/13/04 11:52:59 AM
5/13/04 2:34:57 PM
|
Font size 3 gives font size 3 :-)
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Edited by ben_tilly
May 13, 2004, 02:34:57 PM EDT
|
Post #154,979
5/13/04 12:00:21 PM
|
Fix-eded it.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute.
Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
|
Post #155,088
5/13/04 10:15:08 PM
|
Point missed, relative size or no:
The *preview* correctly scales down from the [default] size, in this case "-2".
The saved version does not. They should be consistent, the holy mantra of 'logic'.
(Can be handy in sub- super- scripts re formulas, for just one legit matter)
If the display fonts cannot display smaller than the default font, why should the preview imply They Can? (and obv. Do - in preview)
Pshaw
|
Post #155,091
5/13/04 10:28:38 PM
5/13/04 10:29:53 PM
|
Re: Point missed, relative size or no:
This is small, not so small, and normal.
It's just there to tease you, Ashton.
Actually, it's not that -2 doesn't work... it's that the text for post content is made smaller - the size of -1. So your small text, while just as small as it is in preview, isn't as small relative to the "normal" content text.
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Edited by admin
May 13, 2004, 10:29:53 PM EDT
|
Post #155,118
5/14/04 6:41:16 AM
5/14/04 6:51:20 AM
|
Ah OK.. let's see what "-3" does with a [bias = -1]
This makes you appear so much lesser.
ie
This makes you appear so much {font color="black" size=-3}lesser.{/font} with the usual '/<>'s.
92U235
Edit.. hmmm - still seems to be an asymptote, and not an increment.
Edit2.. even Worse with (-3).
You may say (re broccoli) it's spinach! and the hell with it..
I say - the sucker's Broken. Still.
Edited by Ashton
May 14, 2004, 06:48:04 AM EDT
Edited by Ashton
May 14, 2004, 06:51:20 AM EDT
|
Post #155,097
5/13/04 10:54:48 PM
|
Okay... Now you have me at a loss.
Here is what *I* see in preview... and the source for it. And of course I also see very similar to the previewSCR. [image|http://www.gregfolkert.net/pics/screenshots/tn/previewSCR.jpg||||]
[link|http://www.gregfolkert.net/pics/screenshots/previewSCR.png|previewSCR] | | [image|http://www.gregfolkert.net/pics/screenshots/tn/previewSRC.jpg||||]
[link|http://www.gregfolkert.net/pics/screenshots/previewSRC.png|previewSRC] |
I do not understand Sir. Font size=1 sub and super script == subscriptsuperscriptPlease enlighten me. --
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Give a man a match, he'll be warm for a minute.
Set him on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life!
|
