That they are trying to do as much damage control as they can, and releasing pictures that are even worse isn't going to help matters.
Granted, that's provided they can keep the media from releasing them.
Nightowl >8#
New torture pictures too disturbing to disseminate
- (GBert)
- (18)
- May 13, 2004, 11:53:57 AM EDT
Re: New torture pictures too disturbing to disseminate
- (rickw)
- (3)
- May 13, 2004, 12:43:38 PM EDT
Christian or not, makes no diff I think
- (GBert)
- (2)
- May 17, 2004, 05:25:53 PM EDT
Not so much
- (Steven A S)
- May 18, 2004, 03:24:55 PM EDT
Agree wholeheartedly.
- (rickw)
- May 18, 2004, 03:39:32 PM EDT
My guess is
- (Nightowl)
- May 13, 2004, 01:23:58 PM EDT
They just need to set expectations correctly
- (ben_tilly)
- (12)
- May 13, 2004, 02:14:38 PM EDT
Ben, that web site ...
- (dmarker)
- (11)
- May 14, 2004, 04:46:55 AM EDT
No problem for secure browsers.
- (pwhysall)
- May 14, 2004, 06:00:24 AM EDT
Sorry
- (ben_tilly)
- (3)
- May 14, 2004, 11:20:48 AM EDT
I have 1 PC with IE
- (dmarker)
- (2)
- May 14, 2004, 05:24:06 PM EDT
My apologies again
- (ben_tilly)
- May 14, 2004, 05:30:50 PM EDT
You CAN lock down IE.
- (Silverlock)
- May 14, 2004, 10:44:06 PM EDT
Figures.
- (rickw)
- (5)
- May 18, 2004, 03:46:05 PM EDT
Not really hard
- (jake123)
- (4)
- May 18, 2004, 04:08:23 PM EDT
Re: Not really hard
- (rickw)
- (3)
- May 19, 2004, 02:20:47 PM EDT
Well, what I was trying to say was
- (jake123)
- (2)
- May 19, 2004, 08:10:47 PM EDT
If virtue were a cheese shop
- (Ashton)
- May 20, 2004, 04:01:14 AM EDT
Good points.
- (rickw)
- May 26, 2004, 02:49:48 PM EDT