IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New It *doesn't* need them.
That's the frustrating part. The separate interfaces, linked only with a separate config file, are the crazed concoction of some idiot at Sun. Try making inherited EJBs sometime... great fun.*

This could all be accomplished with reflection much more easily.





* In the same way that peeling strips of flesh off your arm with a rusty fishhook is fun for people with self-destructive tendencies...
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New I think EJB's came from IBM
     Are EJBs really this painful? - (ben_tilly) - (15)
         AdminiScott's dislike of them seems rather reasonable. -NT - (CRConrad)
         Yes ... - (bluke) - (5)
             IDE Generating boilerplate - (tuberculosis) - (4)
                 Can someone give a good explanation of Home, Remote, etc? - (bluke) - (3)
                     It *doesn't* need them. - (admin) - (1)
                         I think EJB's came from IBM -NT - (bluke)
                     Theoretical distributability - (tuberculosis)
         Yes. -NT - (admin)
         It's worse - (ChrisR)
         They purposely F'd it up to make OO look bad -NT - (tablizer) - (4)
             Actually EJB's have little to do with OO - (bluke) - (3)
                 So bad that no paradigm wants to claim it? - (tablizer) - (2)
                     Huh? Are you making up stuff as you go along, again? - (CRConrad) - (1)
                         Old school usenet style. -NT - (jake123)
         OK, I get it! - (jb4)

And we had great cheese together.
112 ms