Post #136,710
1/20/04 3:16:11 PM
|
Explain this pattern
\nA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 J Q K\n* * * * * * * * * * * * *\n* 2 * 4 * 6 * 8 * 10 * Q *\n* 2 3 4 * * * 8 9 10 * * *\n* 2 3 * * * * * 9 10 * Q *\n* 2 3 * 5 * * * 9 * * Q *\n* 2 3 * 5 6 * * 9 * * * *\n* 2 3 * 5 6 7 8 * 10 J Q K\n
-drl
|
Post #136,714
1/20/04 3:20:44 PM
|
they is 14 face cards and an ace, time to double down
same old crap, con artists ripping off fools. Ah, hell, Catholic Church it start off that way. They All do. Jesus probably had three walnut shells one pea, then he's dead and can't be questioned, Gabriel Dupre
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #136,717
1/20/04 3:23:24 PM
|
Rephrase - Explain this pattern unless you're drunk
-drl
|
Post #136,723
1/20/04 3:48:38 PM
|
/me recuses himself...
|
Post #136,727
1/20/04 4:12:01 PM
|
No
----------------------------------------- .sig pending
|
Post #136,734
1/20/04 4:35:49 PM
|
Sesame Street meets The Matrix.
How can you count to 10 if you have no mouth, Mr. Anderson?
Regards,
-scott anderson
"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
|
Post #136,752
1/20/04 6:24:18 PM
|
pshaw aint never bin drunk at 3 in the afternoon
not unless Im three days into it. thanx, bill
same old crap, con artists ripping off fools. Ah, hell, Catholic Church it start off that way. They All do. Jesus probably had three walnut shells one pea, then he's dead and can't be questioned, Gabriel Dupre
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #136,753
1/20/04 6:28:17 PM
|
Re: pshaw aint never bin drunk at 3 in the afternoon
Well, 13 cards is a big poker hand :)
"Take the hat in the middle."
-drl
|
Post #136,755
1/20/04 6:48:10 PM
|
blackjack, ya maroon as in played/available
same old crap, con artists ripping off fools. Ah, hell, Catholic Church it start off that way. They All do. Jesus probably had three walnut shells one pea, then he's dead and can't be questioned, Gabriel Dupre
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #137,025
1/21/04 11:20:30 PM
|
So what is it?
|
Post #137,029
1/21/04 11:45:00 PM
|
No one's even gonna try? Last call
-drl
|
Post #137,032
1/21/04 11:58:53 PM
1/22/04 12:11:43 AM
|
Bigger pattern - and a partial explanation (supply the rest)
\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16\n* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *\n* 2 * 4 * 6 * 8 * 10 * 12 * 14 * 16\n* 2 3 4 * * * 8 9 10 * * * 14 15 16\n* 2 3 * * * * * 9 10 * 12 * 14 15 *\n* 2 3 * 5 * * * 9 * * 12 * 14 * *\n* 2 3 * 5 6 * * 9 * * * * 14 * *\n* 2 3 * 5 6 7 * 9 * * * * * * *\n* 2 3 * 5 6 7 8 9 * * * * * * 16\n* 2 3 * 5 6 7 8 * 10 11 12 13 14 15 *\n Start with N cards with the number N on the face, in order, face up. Turn over every card. Turn over every other card. Turn over every third card. Etc. until you reach N div 2 + 1 (integer division). Turn over that one and all the others to the right, and you're done. Explain why some cards are left face down :)
-drl
Edited by deSitter
Jan. 22, 2004, 12:02:49 AM EST
Edited by deSitter
Jan. 22, 2004, 12:11:43 AM EST
|
Post #137,037
1/22/04 3:55:43 AM
|
Squares
Finite Differences in reverse.
|
Post #137,040
1/22/04 6:55:15 AM
1/22/04 6:55:54 AM
|
Re: Squares
Aye - and why squares?
In the process of turning cards, we can think of the "deck" as the totality of integers, and ask what happens to any integer. Suppose the integer is prime - then the only factors are 1 and the number, so it gets turned exactly twice, and at the end, is face up. If not prime, then the number will usually have various representations M = IJ with I and J less than M and I not equal J - since there are two distinct factors, M will again be turned twice for each such representation, and at the end, will have been turned an even number of times and be face up.
There is one exception - if M is a square, then it has a representation M = JJ, and gets turned only once for this representation, so the total number of turns it undergoes is odd - and it ends up face down.
-drl
Edited by deSitter
Jan. 22, 2004, 06:55:54 AM EST
|