IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Whither Scripting? Forum / Re: No clue, but...
Post #125,013
by deSitter
Picture of deSitter
11/10/03 9:20:35 PM
Reply
New Re: No clue, but...
Are you sure of that? I would think that any document that tries to do any macro would raise the warning. If what you say is true, then that is the most balled up "feature" I can think of.
-drl
Post #125,112
by ben_tilly
11/11/03 10:42:27 AM
Reply
New The goal is only to avoid annoying the users
Annoying yourself is acceptable.

Also I haven't used Windows enough recently to know where the warning is coming from. My guess is that Outlook is doing it as an anti-virus feature. So running the program wouldn't generate a warning. I could trivially be wrong on that. But I would be surprised if the warning was something that you couldn't choose to silence on your machine...

Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
     Programmatically stripping VBA from a document? - (inthane-chan) - (12) - Nov. 10, 2003, 05:48:31 PM EST
         No clue, but... - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Nov. 10, 2003, 08:56:03 PM EST
             Re: No clue, but... - (deSitter) - (1) - Nov. 10, 2003, 09:20:35 PM EST
                 The goal is only to avoid annoying the users - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 11, 2003, 10:42:27 AM EST
         CodeModule - (altmann) - Nov. 11, 2003, 03:48:37 AM EST
         Some ways to do it - (orion) - (7) - Nov. 11, 2003, 04:09:36 PM EST
             And this is why I never filtered you. (new thread) - (inthane-chan) - Nov. 11, 2003, 04:16:55 PM EST
             RTF Conversion. - (static) - (5) - Nov. 12, 2003, 06:53:04 AM EST
                 Boy, was *that* not what I expected - (drewk) - (4) - Nov. 12, 2003, 09:31:05 AM EST
                     You're working too hard. -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2003, 02:33:39 PM EST
                         Nope, thought the same too... -NT - (jbrabeck) - Nov. 12, 2003, 02:41:46 PM EST
                     I had done a "double take" to get it right. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Nov. 12, 2003, 04:44:52 PM EST
                     LOL. -NT - (static) - Nov. 14, 2003, 05:42:46 AM EST

Any more than we can resent a dog licking its own testicles.
56 ms