do, averb eg: fat fingers do

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #123,521 by boxley 10/30/03 9:51:04 PM Reply	do, averb eg: fat fingers do this is gramatical boucherey up wid which i shall not put. Union Stewedard IWETHEY local 1 FLA unit thanx. bill "You're just like me streak. You never left the free-fire zone.You think aspirins and meetings and cold showers are going to clean out your head. What you want is God's permission to paint the trees with the bad guys. That wont happen big mon." Clete questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #123,547 by CRConrad 10/31/03 4:35:41 AM Reply	Bullshit! You wrote, "consequence 'do' to reason". If you'd really meant DO, the verb, then you'd have written "...transactions fail; in 65 % of the cases, because of what user's fat fingers do...", or something like that. With the word "do" _after_ the "fat fingers", not between the consequence (transactions fail) and the reason (fat fingers). But you didn't; you wrote: "transactions fail 65% 'do' to fat fingers", with "do" between the consequence and the reason -- the EXACT structure you'd also use in the correct sentence (fragment), "transactions fail, 65 % due to fat fingers". So FERFUCKSSAKE, don't try to weasel your way out like that! Sheesh, man -- it's one thing to be sloppy with language (and that's bad enough), but not to stand up for it like a man...? I certainly thought better than that of you! [link\|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode\|Christian R. Conrad] (I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.) Resident [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=119792\|zIWETHEY pilkunnussija]
Post #123,604 by boxley 10/31/03 9:32:01 PM Reply	I wasnt weaseling, I was dumping in yer punchbowl Of course I meant due, not do, but I wtyping as quickly with 2 fingers as my thoughts tumbled out. It was not a post that was spell. check rethought and rewrote brfore send because if I did that it wouldnt be a conversation, at least at my end. thanx, bill "You're just like me streak. You never left the free-fire zone.You think aspirins and meetings and cold showers are going to clean out your head. What you want is God's permission to paint the trees with the bad guys. That wont happen big mon." Clete questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #123,609 by Silverlock 10/31/03 10:42:31 PM Reply	We won't mind. Generally a conversation is real time. What we do here is best described as a delayed response conversation. You are allowed to rapidly type your thoughts and then clean up the spelling. '[', '4' and '3' are just some of the characters (def. 11 [link\|http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=characters%20\|Dictionary.com]) I edited from the above post before submitting. /pedant ----------------------------------------- It is much harder to be a liberal than a conservative. Why? Because it is easier to give someone the finger than it is to give them a helping hand. Mike Royko
Post #123,694 by boxley 11/2/03 11:57:06 AM Reply	is ped any relation to adam? :-) "You're just like me streak. You never left the free-fire zone.You think aspirins and meetings and cold showers are going to clean out your head. What you want is God's permission to paint the trees with the bad guys. That wont happen big mon." Clete questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]

Paid your "dos", haveya, BOx...? (=Learn to fucking SPELL!) - (CRConrad) - (8) - Oct. 30, 2003, 04:48:26 PM EST

Is it me or our Language Watchdog slipped? - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Oct. 30, 2003, 04:56:14 PM EST

Aaargh! You're prefectly right, of course. :-( - (CRConrad) - Oct. 31, 2003, 04:40:14 AM EST

hAve a beneficent theory - (Ashton) - Oct. 30, 2003, 09:09:59 PM EST

do, averb eg: fat fingers do - (boxley) - (4) - Oct. 30, 2003, 09:51:04 PM EST

Bullshit! You wrote, "consequence 'do' to reason". - (CRConrad) - (3) - Oct. 31, 2003, 04:35:41 AM EST

I wasnt weaseling, I was dumping in yer punchbowl - (boxley) - (2) - Oct. 31, 2003, 09:32:01 PM EST

We won't mind. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Oct. 31, 2003, 10:42:31 PM EST

is ped any relation to adam? :-) -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 2, 2003, 11:57:06 AM EST

iwethey.org

Boogity, boogity, boogity, amen!
44 ms