IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Do you have a copy of the original specifications request?
Re-forward it back with a note saying that the supplied pictures are unusable and the attached message tells you why. Perhaps suggest if they can't do this (or don't understand the request), they should hire a professional photographer who does.

Wade, who has himself gotten better at framing but only by dint of effort.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

New Rule of thirds
Mentally draw a tic-tac-toe grid onto the frame dividing it into thirds vertically and horizontally. The four vertices of the lines (or the four corners of the center square, depending on how much Hollywood Squares you've watched) are where you put your center of interest. (Unless you're shooting headshots, which is almost never a good idea anyeay, but more on that later.)

If you can't decide whether to use the top or bottom (or left or right) third for your subject, because either choice leaves too much of the frame blank, you're not shooting tight enough.

For headshots, full-frontal looks like a mug shot. At least have their shoulders turned to one side or the other. Abuse of this guideline, however, leads to all the faux-"action" shots you see in coprorate literature. Most people can't walk this fine line very consistently. This is why we make professional photographers.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Other framing clues.
The first and simplest one is Fill The Frame! It is the simplest thing for the untrained to do because it doesn't need much explanation and it has clear benefits. Then you move onto cropping, thirds, depth-of-field etc. Only after is grasped can you then discuss when to break the rules. :-)

And another clue about portraits is to not have people stand close against a background. *That* makes it look like a mugshot. They need to stand away from the wall or whatever by at least 3 feet. 5 or 6 is probably best.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

New Re: Do you have a copy of the original specifications reques

Additional suggestion: take a particularly botched shot, preferably out of focus, motion blur, red-eye, overcompressed, and poorly composed. Crop and tighten, emphasizing flaws. Note that this is typical of results being obtained. Contrast this with a well-composed shot (profession if you must) for contrast.

--\r\n
Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n
[link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\n
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n
[link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n
\r\n
   Keep software free.     Oppose the CBDTPA.     Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n
     idiots and digital cameras - (rcareaga) - (5)
         OT a film for you - (deSitter)
         Do you have a copy of the original specifications request? - (static) - (3)
             Rule of thirds - (drewk) - (1)
                 Other framing clues. - (static)
             Re: Do you have a copy of the original specifications reques - (kmself)

This is also known as CIA-assisted self-determination.
106 ms