IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New O'Reilly's response in his column today
[link|http://www.billoreilly.com/currentarticle|url]

Fair And Balanced
By: Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Thursday, Aug 14, 2003

In a few weeks the Fox News Channel will celebrate its seventh birthday awash in publicity and success.

From virtually nothing, the organization that employs me has risen up to become one of the most powerful news agencies in the country. This is a stunning achievement but it's also one that has engendered bitterness and controversy.

Fox has succeeded by mixing a populist-traditional, pro-American editorial posture with lively debate that includes voices the traditional network news organizations would never allow airtime.

The accusation that Fox is a conservative network is pure propaganda as poll after poll has demonstrated that FNC's audience is across the board ideologically and demographically.

The latest survey taken by Mediamark Research finds that more ultra-conservative viewers watch CNN than FNC.

But facts don't matter to the Fox haters who are, themselves, primarily ultra-liberal.

The dominance of FNC in the cable news world has shattered the stranglehold the left had on TV news for decades, and that has caused fear and loathing in some political circles.

Using liberal-leaning newspapers and publishing houses, the critics of FNC have unleashed defamatory personal attacks on me and other Fox news analysts and have attempted to denigrate the entire network.

If Fox News crashed and burned tomorrow, these people would toast marshmallows in the flames.

Now Fox News is striking back by putting the demonizers on notice that they will be held responsible when they violate trademarks or launch defamatory personal attacks on Fox personnel.

It is simply a sorry joke to see a political activist like Al Franken labeled a "satirist" by The New York Times.

Attempting to smear and destroy the reputations of those with whom you politically disagree is not satire.

If that were the case Richard Nixon's Watergate plumbers would all be writing for Saturday Night Live. Hello, Donald Segretti, thanks for the satire, what a wit you are.

Fox News has become the highest rated news network on cable because we feature lively debate and all honest voices are welcome.

We don't do drive-by character assassinations and we don't denigrate opposing points of view by launching gratuitous personal attacks.

FNC's presentation is in the tradition of the raucous town meeting where passion and conviction is on display.

We challenge people of all political persuasions.

It makes me sick to see intellectually dishonest individuals hide behind the first amendment to spread propaganda, libel and slander.

But this is a growing trend in America where the exchange of ideas often degenerates into verbal mud wrestling with intent to injure.

The pubahs at The New York Times know what a smear campaign is but apparently if it's directed at an enterprise the paper disapproves of it's okay.

I wonder how the Times' editorialists would react if their faces graced a book cover accompanied by the word "liar."

Oh that's right, they'd consider it "satire."

This country is a better place because Fox News has succeeded. Now there is a wider range of thought and expression available 24/7. But the country is worse off because of the brutal repercussions of that success.

A nation that prides itself on diversity of opinion and acceptance of differing political points-of-view is being subjected to an orgy of media defamation and sometimes outright hatred.

And satire has nothing to do with it.

lincoln
"If you're on your deathbed and you haven't got a story to tell, then you haven't lived. - Asa Baber"
[link|http://users3.ev1.net/~bconnors/resume.htm|VB/SQL resume]
[link|http://users3.ev1.net/~bconnors/tandem_resume.htm|Tandem resume]
[link|mailto:bconnors@ev1.net|contact me]
New That's scary
I think he actually believes that. A point by point rebuttle is possible, but why waste time? Describing Al Franken as a political activist is enough to make you realise this man has a teunuous relationship with rationality.
-----------------------------------------
[link|http://www.talion.com/questionw.html|?W]
Where were you in 72?
     Fox News sues Al Franken - (lincoln) - (5)
         FOX doesn't know about Oscar's (Wilde) libel case. Natch. -NT - (Ashton)
         A letter to Ann Coulter - (hnick) - (1)
             Orotund oleaginous OOooohhhhs! - (Ashton)
         O'Reilly's response in his column today - (lincoln) - (1)
             That's scary - (Silverlock)

I hope you don't mind if I don't read this. I don't know if it's going where I don't want it to be going, but if it is going there, I *don't* want to go there, so the best place for me to be is here, not there, and here is where I'm staying.
*puts on blinders*
*whistles very loudly*
*claws out own eyes*
126 ms