Jobs |
"Took time off for a while", "back by now"???
- (CRConrad)
- Aug. 2, 2001, 04:49:52 AM EDT
|
Patent Wars and Antitrust |
Gotta take issue with one point in another of your articles:
- (CRConrad)
- Aug. 2, 2001, 04:35:16 AM EDT
|
Test Forum |
I got an even better one:
- (CRConrad)
- Aug. 1, 2001, 10:07:08 AM EDT
|
Theory and Practice of Programming |
Isn't it obvious that that's fscking styoopid?!?
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- (3)
- Aug. 1, 2001, 07:01:41 AM EDT
|
Theory and Practice of Programming |
Heh, that seems to have taken care of itself... :-)
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- (1)
- Aug. 1, 2001, 06:58:59 AM EDT
|
Science |
(Now that seems to have been one sadly wasted edit.)
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- (2)
- July 31, 2001, 09:13:35 AM EDT
|
Jobs |
From the Disinfo-place? Look at it this way:
- (CRConrad)
- (2)
- July 31, 2001, 09:11:42 AM EDT
|
News Picks |
Yeah - follow the link in Peter's post...
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- July 31, 2001, 09:06:37 AM EDT
|
News Picks |
No - I want clarity and simplicity *from YOU*, here.
- (CRConrad)
- (3)
- July 31, 2001, 04:21:21 AM EDT
|
Theory and Practice of Programming |
Most existing languages have that syntax: C, Pascal, Java...
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- (21)
- July 31, 2001, 02:29:49 AM EDT
|