WHOA!! Wait a minute...

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #99,230 by Simon_Jester 4/29/03 8:57:37 AM Reply	WHOA!! Wait a minute... weren't you the one who said that our number one reason for taking down Saddam WASN'T "For the People"? Now you're arguing that's the JUSTIFICATION?
Post #99,250 by jbrabeck 4/29/03 10:36:03 AM Reply	Reason de jour Ain't found no WMD, gotta change the reason. Now it's "Saddam was a naughty man". Tomorrow it'll be "I didn't get any last month". [link\|mailto:jbrabeck@attbi.com\|Joe]
Post #99,301 by Simon_Jester 4/29/03 1:22:23 PM Reply	But, would this be two changes or one? Because I already called him on this way back when he first started arguing that "we were doing it for the people". (I pointed out the risk of that argument and that he had to accept full responsibility for it - and that game STILL isn't fully played out). He weaseled and claimed that WASN'T the prime reason for attacking Iraq. Now he's claiming it is.
Post #99,303 by inthane-chan 4/29/03 1:32:43 PM Reply	It's simpler than that. He just picks whichever position is the most convenient to back up his assertions at any given time. After 9/11, Bush made two statements: 1. "Terrorists hate America because America is a land of freedom and opportunity." 2. "We intend to attack the root causes of terrorism." Sounds like everything is going according to plan.
Post #99,361 by Ashton 4/29/03 6:26:19 PM Reply	Is this called 'castling', in Chess? Checkers a better fit..

This'll stoke yer fires - (pwhysall) - (23) - April 23, 2003, 08:10:12 AM EDT

Sorry. Try harder. - (marlowe) - (22) - April 23, 2003, 08:59:34 AM EDT

Who claims it's impatience? -NT - (Simon_Jester) - April 23, 2003, 09:17:56 AM EDT

"Impatience is not a compelling argument."__I see. - (Ashton) - (19) - April 23, 2003, 06:55:09 PM EDT

Re: "Rogue State" - (a6l6e6x) - April 23, 2003, 09:53:01 PM EDT

Of course not... - (Simon_Jester) - April 24, 2003, 09:21:53 AM EDT

Tortured idea indeed. Twelve years of Saddam's subjects... - (marlowe) - (16) - April 28, 2003, 08:36:53 PM EDT

Twelve years. - (pwhysall) - (10) - April 29, 2003, 12:38:01 AM EDT

Already been debunked. And you know it. - (marlowe) - (9) - April 29, 2003, 08:47:31 AM EDT

Freud used to call this 'projection'. - (Ashton) - (7) - April 29, 2003, 05:21:37 PM EDT

"Just you wait!" - (marlowe) - (6) - April 29, 2003, 05:33:59 PM EDT

It's spelled, v i n d i c t i v e - and it is a 'mindset'. -NT - (Ashton) - (5) - April 29, 2003, 06:40:59 PM EDT

I know you guys are all experts on "vindictive" - (marlowe) - (4) - April 30, 2003, 08:05:00 PM EDT

Aww...come one... - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - April 30, 2003, 08:25:59 PM EDT

Only 8? - (inthane-chan) - (2) - April 30, 2003, 09:08:51 PM EDT

To quote their [Clinton bashers] hero... - (mmoffitt) - May 3, 2003, 04:07:07 PM EDT

If.. we didn't have our very own Curtiss Le May^hrlowe - (Ashton) - May 3, 2003, 08:33:25 PM EDT

On Mrs T. - (pwhysall) - April 29, 2003, 05:57:50 PM EDT

WHOA!! Wait a minute... - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - April 29, 2003, 08:57:37 AM EDT

Reason de jour - (jbrabeck) - (3) - April 29, 2003, 10:36:03 AM EDT

But, would this be two changes or one? - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - April 29, 2003, 01:22:23 PM EDT

It's simpler than that. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - April 29, 2003, 01:32:43 PM EDT

Is this called 'castling', in Chess? Checkers a better fit.. -NT - (Ashton) - April 29, 2003, 06:26:19 PM EDT

Impatience? - (pwhysall) - April 29, 2003, 12:41:07 AM EDT

I don't want to write it, and you don't want to see it.
87 ms