A nit with your nit :)

Post #99,202 by Steve Lowe 4/29/03 12:12:11 AM Reply	A nit with your nit :) It does depend on the copyright holder, but that's not always the artist themselves. Artists in the biz typically publish their material through distribution houses such as ASCAP and BMI, by record deal mandate. They're very much against sharing. Major record deals typically dictate what artists can do with their own material. A distinction also needs to be drawn between indie artists and those in the mainstream. Mainstream artists under a major record contract will almost never offer more than one complete song for download from a CD. It's more common to see clips of songs, at poor quality, rather than complete tunes. A lot of the time, those are streamed only, no download. Indie artists, on the other hand, will offer more complete tunes, at decent quality, with the intention of making a name for themselves. They WANT these files distributed as far and wide as possible. Incidentally, Indie artists do make money from their CD sales, often a large part of their income. Mainstream artists usually make about 10 - 15 cents per disc or tape sold. ----- Steve
Post #99,242 by cwbrenn 4/29/03 10:20:31 AM Reply	A nit with your nit re. my nit :) I guess I can see the importance of the distinction, insofar as the majority of artists against file sharing have little direct ownership over their music. That's an interesting thing I haven't considered. Though, on ArtistLaunch there are a lot of artists who are very much against file sharing... and I even wrote an article that got posted on Slashdot about how Napster was "bad" (archived on my own site, [link\|http://baptistdeathray.dtcweb.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7\|http://baptistdeathr...viewtopic.php?t=7]), though I was really talking about the "music wants to be free" movement that was growing around Napster. I had no real problem with Napster per se. In my own experience, a lot of musicians seem to want to trade their music until they can "make it," and then they want the trading to STOP, and they want everyone to buy everything. That seems a bit inconsistent. From my own perspective, Pandora's box is open -- unlike the Greek myth, music swapping has advantages, just like tape-swapping did. The only practical solution is to get the music swapping community to be amenable to supporting the artists they like. To do this, the big-name bands and their labels are going to have to change some of the ways they do business. For one thing, they're going to have to freaking lower their CD prices. Your average CD costs $16 a pop, and "average" CDs are rarer and rarer these days. That's just... stupid, and that stupidity is just more fuel to the fire for the more radical elements of the online music trading venue. Ooops, I'm ranting again... time to get more coffee. "We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?" - Edward Young
Post #99,247 by drewk 4/29/03 10:31:48 AM Reply	ICLRPD (new thread) Created as new thread #99246 titled [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=99246\|ICLRPD] === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.

Welcome to IWETHEY!