IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New What new International Laws might the world develop ...
... in light of the acts against humanity on September 11, 2001?

How many countries might be interested in laws that might protect them from terrorism?

How many might be willing to cooperate in order to make themselves more safe?

A better question might be, how many wouldn't?


Someone once said, "Let he who is without sin throw the first stone".
Collapse Edited by brettj Sept. 18, 2001, 11:54:30 PM EDT
What new International Laws might the world develop ...
... in light of the acts against humanity on September 11, 2001? How many countries might be interested in laws that might protect them from terrorism? How many might be willing to cooperate in order to make themselves more safe? A better question might be, how many wouldn't?
New Laws --> enforcement.
As here - where for every new problem, pols pass new laws --> you need a $300/hr lawyer merely to sort out the dbase of this artery-clogging crap.

Ditto internationally except: we still all give highly limited access to 'sovereignty issues' re the UN (then blame them for being 'ineffective'). It's what we do.

So no.. *this time* there may need to occur some actual changes, and not just paper rewriting. Let's start the ball rolling at home:

Abuse a Semite? - get the same book thrown at you - as with 3 Strikes = caught with a month's supply of drugs 3X? = 40 years.

Then we might talk about our very own Terrorist-funding 'War on Drugs' -- that is, if we get so scared that, we actually look! at our internal hypocrisy about the New Prohibition.

(Is WTC enough of a shock yet, to catalyze anything That drastic?)


A.
     What new International Laws might the world develop ... - (brettj) - (1)
         Laws --> enforcement. - (Ashton)

Unless they wink.
61 ms