Post #95,797
4/10/03 2:14:14 PM
4/10/03 2:15:03 PM
|

Hey try my Idea.... shown:
[link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=95033|Tricky Idea]
You might just NOT have to deal with it!
Worst that can happen is you have to "install" debian... be a learning Experience if you can get it!!!!
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - IT Grand-Master for President | [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] | [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|2004, the year Microsoft develops for Linux ] | Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds: The DHS [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Cyberer-Stratergery]. The ultimate in Cyber. |
|
Post #95,807
4/10/03 2:34:34 PM
|

Used your other one: installed from Knoppix
I'm posting from it now. Now I just have to get it to use Gnome ...
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #95,823
4/10/03 3:05:58 PM
|

Man, there's a lot to prune
Knoppix dumps an absolute boatload of apps on the hard drive. I guess that's what it needs for the demo, but now I have to go through and clean it up.
Posting this from lynx while I'm busy purging KDE in another tty.
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #95,852
4/10/03 4:21:45 PM
|

Re: Man, there's a lot to prune
Coupla things.
Firstly, you can kill KDE dead with "apt-get remove libqt4". Nobbling GNOME is likewise a matter of zapping GTK.
Secondly, get debfoster and orphaner going NOW.
debfoster presents you with a list of packages that nothing depends on, and asks you if you want to keep them - if you Prune them, all the deps go, too.
orphaner shows you packages that are not depended on by anything - by default, it only shows you libs, but will show you ALL packages that are non-depended-upon if you supply the "-a" switch. orphaner is provided by the "deborphan" package.
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #95,863
4/10/03 4:51:35 PM
|

What exactly is the difference?
They both seem to provide lists of things that nothing depends on. How are they different?
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #95,866
4/10/03 4:55:22 PM
|

Re: What exactly is the difference?
orphaner makes you pick individual packages to uninstall.
debfoster is the tactical nuke of package removal - with a couple of keystrokes, you can blat enormous amounts of software from your system.
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #95,867
4/10/03 4:56:38 PM
|

OK
So orphaner finds things that are already unused, foster allows you to remove a package and everything that is only used by it. Got it.
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #95,870
4/10/03 4:59:41 PM
|

Why does it keep generating locales?
This is the step that keeps taking so long, and it does it after every action I take with apt.
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|
Post #95,871
4/10/03 5:00:01 PM
4/10/03 5:00:42 PM
|

Oops, dupe
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.

Edited by drewk
April 10, 2003, 05:00:42 PM EDT
|
Post #96,518
4/14/03 1:06:49 PM
|

Another method
Do a fresh Knoppix hd install. Do apt-get upgrade, anser no, and view the list of how many things are going to be updated. Then apt-get remove foo fo2 foo3 foo4 ... fooN of everything you don't want. At least I'm avoiding downloading 280M of updates to (mostly) things I don't want anyway. Then use debfoster and orphaner (which BTW come with Knoppix by default).
===
Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
|