Awww, did the pacifistic weakling beat you up?
very nice, you wont defend or disagree
to the points make by malkin,
Strange, I seem to have quoted her repeatedly in that last post.
And for each of those quotes, I pointed out that I can't find any other source to verify her claims.
And you seem to be confused on what "disagree" means. I do disagree with her "points". That should have been clear from my first post.
...you blithely skip past you personal seattle living response to those quotes because you would not be able to provide a distinct view from the seattlised version.
I understand all of those words, but that sentence is, once again, meaningless.
Are you saying that I'd rather light a candle than directly challenge someone?
!!!SMACKDOWN!!!
I'm the one that's been kicking your ass in these forums.
No candles needed.
As for grammer I am having a conversation you are writing a screed. Note the difference.
And, to you, a "conversation" means that your sentences do NOT have to follow basic rules of grammar (starting with a capital letter, having a clear subject and verb and so forth)?
Yeah, whatever.
I must have bounced your head off the floor a little TOO hard when I applied those SMACKDOWNS to your ass.
But, feel free to make any claims you want.
Those nasty Seattle pacifists would rather light a candle than fight, but they keep spanking those tough Alaskan men and taking their lunch money.
boo hoo hoo.
Well, at least you aren't encumbered by the rules of grammar when you point that out in your "conversation".
hee hee hee