IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Situation map of Baghdad area
Hey, Peter! Spell check this if it makes you feel any better...

[image|http://www.webmutants.com/strategypage/baghdad.gif||||]
----------------------------------------
Any idiot can die for what he believes in. Michael Kelly lived and died in service of the truth.
I support Iraqi troops when they shoot their Fedayeen minders.
The future is leaving the station, the US is at the throttle, and the Left isn't on board.
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html]
New Sucks as much as the previous one
It's like a stick figure. I was hoping for something above the "Risk" level. I found one and lost it. You're wasting my time.

BTW I watched "High Noon" yesterday. Once I wrote a class paper about the parallels with 50s politics - namely, Citizen Kane represents the US against *internal forces* that were destroying it in the name of fighting Communism. I stand by that paper. Your juvenile interpretation of the character is way off.

The screenwriter (Carl Foreman) was to be blacklisted, but Cooper had it postponed until filming of the movie was complete. The director was a "typical Hollywood liberal" and proud of it (Stanley Kramer, who also did "On the Beach" and "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner"). Kane is a man whose past has caught up with him. He's had an affair. It's not explicitly stated, but I get the impression he might have once been on the other side of the law. That is, Kramer made a movie about justice featuring a man with a past - not your Frog-hating trigger man. He's marrying a Quaker, which demands an explicit renunciation of violence.
-drl

Though my feet aren't on the ground,
I've been standing on the sound
Of some open hearted people, going down.
New Let's look at Marlowe's previous posts, shall we?
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=74918|Here, for instance.]

Today, postindustrial America is planning to fight its latest war with highly skilled professional soldiers and sophisticated high-tech machines. We need fewer people\ufffdand can expect far fewer casualties\ufffdto win quicker victories. Critics who look back at World War II with nostalgia and argue for shared sacrifice and a drafted military miss the point. We are no longer the kind of country that fights most effectively that way.
Hmmmm, yet that map seems to indicate the exact opposite of Marlowe's previous post.

[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=74388|or this]
I'm sending my babies into harm's way over there. They won't all make it back in one piece. Oh, and we're sending soldiers, too. (Still haven't completely obsoleted those, but we're making steady progress on it.)

Global hegemony begins in the lab. [cue thunder, lightning and manic laughter]


[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=73003|and this]
Of course, Iraq wants to be treated like North Korea. That's why Iraq is pursuing weapons of mass destruction. And that's why the Bush administration wants to keep that from happening. The whole rationale for stopping Saddam now is that the price might be too high to stop him later, like it already is with North Korea.
Yet, even though we control most of the country outside of the cities, we have not been able to find a SINGLE "WMD".

[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=67550|The best for last]
This project is in the hands of a special multinational task force made up of special elite units and armed with combat helicopters and aircraft, spy-planes and satellites. Unlike the Blix outfit, which is based in Baghdad, the alternative investigators are fanned out across the country. One well-placed source disclosed: \ufffdOur men in the field know where 90 percent of Saddam\ufffds missiles and unconventional weapons systems are located, even the mobile ones that are moved from place to place every hour. We are keeping them under tight, on-site observation because when the war begins we want to be there before Saddam orders his men to hit the triggers.\ufffd
And still we have found nothing.
New Gotta make allowances for the Nintendo folks.__ Maybe Not.
After all - every Nintendo-Eloi wants to be (the adolescent part of-) Ender and send his babies off as surrogates. "Babies" is devastatingly apt - such machines are the closest their inventors ever get, to holding a human one. Logic is enough for a self-made Android.

Odd though.. that in the fictional Ender's case: the ONLY way they could manage to get him to use his skills for Planeticide.. was by *Lying*. The Bad Planet\ufffd had made a mistake; missed the fact of sentient beings here (surely easy enough to do today? - if you study our mechanical stimulus/response actions ... for a while. Much different from an ant farm?)

Ender wasn't at all Planeticidal, when not playing head-games. Fiction may have more that is true than - a President's briefing, for example.

Techno will remove the unpleasant odors, agonized screams and viscous fluids from our attention. If we don't see it - can it be important? Why in no time at all, when V.66.6b hits the production line - we can close the loop on war games! Just dial-in the Desired Outcome. All you need to know is 1s and 0s:


Select: Simulation/War
Select: Desired outcome
Select: Which are the Good Guys A | B
Select: Maim / Annihilate / or Mixed
Caution: Only in Simulate is replay possible.


PRESS TO TEST [*]







RELEASE TO DETONATE.
New No allowances made.
Because Marlowe didn't pick up on the STORY there.

Ender killed only when he HAD to.

Compare his attempts to make friends with his "enemies" with the isolated instances of his killing.

Then, check the references to the information that he HAD killed being kept from him.

Ender did not KNOW he had killed.

He did not KNOW that the was commanding real ships, either.

Ender was popular. People liked him. He had friends. He was a good commander because people respected his decisions.

OSC even went over the OTHER types of commanders. The ones who operated through fear or dis-interest.

Something Marlowe will never understand.

So, Marlowe focuses on the part he CAN understand.

The killing.

Killing == popular.

Popular == killing.

People hang around me because I can score more kills on my Nintendo.

Yes, "people" do. Those "people" are commonly known as "losers" amongst the general population.
New No, you're wasting your time.
You're not going to find a map that shows things the way you want them to be unless you make one up yourself.

Quit whining and face it.
----------------------------------------
Any idiot can die for what he believes in. Michael Kelly lived and died in service of the truth.
I support Iraqi troops when they shoot their Fedayeen minders.
The future is leaving the station, the US is at the throttle, and the Left isn't on board.
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html]
New Marlowe...You learning HTML?
All that is there, besides your sanctimonious swipe at Peter, is a 2-pixel white dot.

This yer first webbug? Ooooh-comma-Aaahh!
jb4
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
Rich Cook
     Situation map of Baghdad area - (marlowe) - (6)
         Sucks as much as the previous one - (deSitter) - (4)
             Let's look at Marlowe's previous posts, shall we? - (Brandioch) - (2)
                 Gotta make allowances for the Nintendo folks.__ Maybe Not. - (Ashton) - (1)
                     No allowances made. - (Brandioch)
             No, you're wasting your time. - (marlowe)
         Marlowe...You learning HTML? - (jb4)

YOU are gonna lecture ME on 'clear prose'?
98 ms