IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New And get a much more direct path to Iraq then w/Turkey! :)
That was worth $30B+.

But then, there's no oil revenue to pay for the "re-building". Shucks! And the Zionist plot would become too obvious as well.

Still with Syria "liberated", could then run pipilines directly East from Iraq oil fields to the Med. Hmmmmm! The United States of Haliburtonia.
Alex

Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction. -- Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
New Still gonna need laborers cheaper than pakistanis
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

Since corporations are the equivelent of human but they have no "concience" they are by definition sociopaths
     Hell, might as well do Syria while in the neighborhood - (rcareaga) - (33)
         awww...come on - (cybermace5)
         And Iran, too. - (mmoffitt) - (7)
             Re: And Iran, too. - (cybermace5) - (6)
                 So the "Anti-Christ" is a good guy? - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                     That's how he's supposed to get into power. -NT - (cybermace5) - (3)
                         Not to worry - (Ashton) - (2)
                             Re: Not to worry - (cybermace5) - (1)
                                 Not everyone: but rife in the Ruling Cabal du jour. Read. -NT - (Ashton)
                     GACK! It's too early for this. YOU GOT ME! - (mmoffitt)
         gives us an excuse to rollup the bekaa valley in any case - (boxley) - (21)
             And those terrorist were as much danger to us as the IRA. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (20)
                 tell that to the 200+ marines they killed -NT - (boxley) - (19)
                     Who were defending Israel not US. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (18)
                         Israel is a tad south of beirut -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                             Israeli interests then. -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                         have a link - (boxley) - (15)
                             I know what happened. - (a6l6e6x) - (14)
                                 It happened when the PLO tried to overthrow King Hussein in - (boxley) - (13)
                                     Subject has changed, and agree with what you said. - (a6l6e6x) - (12)
                                         Re: Subject has changed, and agree with what you said. - (cybermace5)
                                         good question Israel has absorbed and is continuing - (boxley) - (10)
                                             Willing immigrant vs. ethnic cleansing. - (a6l6e6x) - (9)
                                                 the jews of syria, iran, lebanon egypt etc is bulking up - (boxley) - (8)
                                                     The Jews did not come to Palestine in peace. - (a6l6e6x) - (7)
                                                         gee the word armed militants is missing from that account - (boxley) - (6)
                                                             Sorry Box, as pro Israeli as I am (& my ancestors ;-) - I .. - (dmarker)
                                                             No armed militants. - (a6l6e6x) - (4)
                                                                 Objective sources???? - (bluke) - (3)
                                                                     So, Norman Finkelstein, one of your own, lies? - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                                                                         Believe it or not, yes - (bluke) - (1)
                                                                             It is the fact that Israeli Jews are not monolithic - (a6l6e6x)
         And get a much more direct path to Iraq then w/Turkey! :) - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
             Still gonna need laborers cheaper than pakistanis -NT - (boxley)

It's only Monday, and that is already the dumbest question of the week.
101 ms