"China". It's a country. It's rather large.

Post #90,144 by Brandioch 3/21/03 4:21:58 PM Reply	"China". It's a country. It's rather large. If you are like most US citizens, I can understand your inability to locate it on a map. "Russia". Another country. Also fairly large. But, again, I can understand your inability to locate it. Don't feel bad. There are lots of people who have that same problem. You seem to be a bit incoherent today, and quite incapable of a meaningful discussion. Those were the names of COUNTRIES I was posting. You DO know what a "country" is, right? Or maybe you are more familiar with the term "nation"? No? Well, I'm not surprised. pats Scott on head Now go out and play in your backyard. Don't get upset at anything happening outside of your neighborhood.
Post #90,148 by admin 3/21/03 4:31:05 PM Reply	Nice for entertainment... ... but only to those who actually know me, as they will realize how ludicrous your posturing is. I'm sure you believe you've carried off some great insult here -- keep it up if it keeps you out of trouble, I guess. China and Russia (yes, those big ol' Asian countries you're so proud you can find on the map) weren't threatening a veto of anything the UK and US could come up with. France was. Spot the difference? The world isn't as simple as you and Marlowe seem to think it is. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #90,152 by Silverlock 3/21/03 4:35:20 PM Reply	I believe Russia also threatened a veto. It's just that France was more vocal and French bashing is considered chic (whoops, mustn't use french words)er, cool. The world is only a simple place to the simple.
Post #90,158 by admin 3/21/03 9:13:44 PM Reply	Yes, they did. But not an arbitrary one. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #90,186 by Brandioch 3/21/03 10:11:09 PM Reply	Nor was France's "arbitrary". Unless by "arbitrary" you mean, "will not support any resolution that contains wording that we will not support". But by THAT definition, just about ANYTHING is "arbitrary". And China was "threatening" a veto. Along with Russia. Again, if it was JUST France, that could have been handled.
Post #90,149 by bepatient 3/21/03 4:31:50 PM Reply	Get a grammar check. Then maybe you'll notice your butchering of the language a couple posts back. Then maybe you'll understand that Scott was correct about your incoherence. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

Welcome to IWETHEY!