Yep, there's no terrorists in Iraq, and what's more they're gonna wipe out our troops, according to the Brandiochs of the world.
Ahhh, you're trying to be cute.

YOU were the one that said that al Queda was based in Iraq.

I pointed out that our military plans seemed to have NO provision for dealing with suicide terrorists.

Which is very strange, if you KNOW that you'll be facing suicide terrorists.

Very strange indeed.

Well there are, and they won't even be able to catch up with our troops.
Did you not cover basic geography in school yet?

If our troops are advancing INTO Iraq.....

And the terrorists are INSIDE Iraq.....

Then our troops are running TOWARDS the terrorists.

The terrorists won't have to "catch up with our troops".

That would only be the case if the terrorists were OUTSIDE of Iraq.

Hmmmmm, if the terrorists were OUTSIDE of Iraq, that would mean that there weren't any terrorists INSIDE Iraq.

:D

They'll be lucky to even navigate the unfamiliar terrain, being both imported and sans PLGRs.
The terrain is "unfamiliar" because........?

Is it because they've never seen it?

Is that because they aren't there right now?

The terrorists are NOT in Iraq right now?

:D

We'll wipe out their training camp and their sponsor regime, and then kill off the drones in the field one by one.
Okay, our troops attack the terrorist training camp but the terrorists are running to try to "catch up" to our troops?

Why aren't the terrorists at the terrorist training camp?

:D

Wipe out this nest, then move on the next.
All the while, staying AHEAD of the pursuing terrorists.

:D

And there's nothing the Saddam lovers can do about it.
"Saddam lovers"

Hmmmmm.....

"Saddam lovers"

That phrase rings a bell.......

It SORT OF reminds me of.........

"Nigger lovers"

[link|http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22nigger+lovers%22&btnG=Google+Search|google]

Ah yes. You can always spot someone's ideological bent from the phrases he uses.

You'd think that your kind of people would learn over time.