Well that explains it.

Post #86,637 by Brandioch 3/7/03 9:57:21 PM Reply	Well that explains it. #1. You post "facts" that you know are incorrect, hoping that I won't have the correct ones. #2. You don't follow the links I provide that support my position. #3. You assume that you already know what I've refering to. #4. When it is finally ground into you that you're wrong, you go off on some weirdness that has nothing to do with the subject. :D Bookmarked.
Post #86,650 by boxley 3/7/03 11:00:50 PM Reply	Incorrect on number one No slaves in Israel since AD 70 is a fact. The nation of Israel was destroyed as an entity at that time so they had no governing laws since then. The laws before that time concerning the ownership and feeding of slaves were concise. The state of Israel established in 1948 was established with no laws against owning people, didnt mention it. Didnt appear to the founders that it would be nescessary. This also is a fact. both of the above facts are correct. One was deliberately misleading in context. check your logic. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #86,657 by Brandioch 3/7/03 11:28:53 PM Reply	Read those links. Israel did have slaves in the year 2000. Now, you can go on about whether "Israel" you are talking about is the "Israel" that exists today. In fact, I fully expect you to. Despite those 4 links I posted showing that in Israel, there were slaves kept, legally, up until 2002. No slaves in Israel since AD 70 is a fact. No, that is a lie. There were slave in Israel in 2002. Since 2002 comes AFTER 70, then there HAVE been "slaves in Israel since AD 70". The state of Israel established in 1948 was established with no laws against owning people, didnt mention it. That is correct. It was legal to own slaves in Israel from 1948 until 2002. And slaves were owned. both of the above facts are correct. No. One of them is correct. The other is a lie. One was deliberately misleading in context. If by "deliberately misleading" you mean "outright lie", well, that would be about par for the course. Slaves in Israel in 2002 legally You want to argue with that, I have provided links to 4 stories on the subject. Claim all you want that such was NOT the case, that is simply lies and denial on your part. Slaves in Israel in 2002 legally And I have posted the links. Here.....[link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86421\|If by "AD 70" you mean the year 2002....] Awwww, does that spanking still hurt? I think I jarred your brains loose when I laid that smack down on you.
Post #86,662 by boxley 3/7/03 11:38:55 PM Reply	so according to you the present country of Israel is the same as the one disencorporated in AD 70? thank you, will you now assist the current government to get all the trespassers accross the river jordan? Or will you admit that The Israel existing prior to AD70 is a different Israel than the one today. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #86,670 by Brandioch 3/7/03 11:54:36 PM Reply	THAT is your rational? That "Israel" is not "Israel"? Because YOU were refering to some other "Israel"? The Israel existing prior to AD70 is a different Israel than the one today. So, when you complained that only blacks could own slaves... and I replied that it was legal in Israel to own slaves in 2002... When you said that I was wrong, it was because YOU were refering to an Israel that had stopped existing in 70 AD... So, I wasn't wrong. Yet you said I was. Because "Israel" didn't exist in the 21st century. But I stated that Israel, in the 21st century allowed slavery. But, to you, "Israel" does not exist in the 21st century. Yep. I can see that I'm going to be posting links to this thread a LOT in the future. hahahahahahahhahaha You really should have just accepted the smack down and shut up. :D
Post #86,679 by boxley 3/8/03 12:32:35 AM Reply	So you admit that Israel of ancient times is the same as todays state of Israel. If you do not admit they are the same, say so. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #86,750 by Brandioch 3/8/03 12:41:58 PM Reply	Israelis owned slaves in Israel in the year 2000. I was the one that introduced Israel in that thread. And I gave the time frame in that same post. So in order for YOU to be right that Israel did not have slaves in 2000.... Well, there is no way for you to be right. Israelis DID have slaves in the year 2000, in Israel, legally. Play all the games you want to, but that is a fact. And I have posted 4 links substantiating that fact. So now you'll go off on some semantic game about whether "Israel" is "Israel" or whether "Israel" is not "Israel". Israel, in the year 2000, allowed legal ownership of slaves and slaves were kept in Israel in the year 2000. I know this must REALLY tear your "Israel is soooo great" heart apart. But, those are the breaks.
Post #86,660 by Silverlock 3/7/03 11:31:31 PM Reply	I would have gone for smug graciousness. 1. It could be worked for a laugh. 2. Or not Sometimes, self respect says you just have to speak out.
Post #86,666 by Brandioch 3/7/03 11:42:33 PM Reply	Could have. But I have a feeling that I'm going to be linking to this thread many times in the future. If the future reflects the past, which it usually does. I've suspected for a long time that he was not reading links and simply posting "from the hip" regarding what he thought I was saying and then going through the semantic games in attempts to cover his errors. Particularly, check the above sub-thread where he's still claiming that slaves were not kept in Israel since 70 AD. I can't have any lower opinion of Marlowe, yet I still read the references he posts.
Post #86,669 by boxley 3/7/03 11:50:55 PM Reply	ROLF! the master of semantic games whining Well one thing is for sure I will be checking ALL links in future. All asides though I enjoy the reparte and consider you a interesting poster always worth a right shift or two. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #86,672 by deSitter 3/7/03 11:55:24 PM Reply	Rolf Borlandweg! -drl
Post #86,673 by Brandioch 3/7/03 11:56:27 PM Reply	And here's the link. [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86618\|Here] Pay particular attention to the bit where you claim that when I say Israel allowed slavery in 2002 that you say it doesn't because "Israel" doesn't exist. hhahahahahahahhahahahahaha Yep, this link is going to get A LOT of usage.
Post #86,681 by boxley 3/8/03 12:45:30 AM 3/8/03 1:56:50 PM Reply	here is a link of yours claiming that only uneducated people post on items where they have no knowledge [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86092\|fixed link] followed by a link that proves you are in that group [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86157\|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=86157] have you ever stated an opinion on a legal matter? You know you have, so what law school did you attend? If not law school which law firm did you work for? Maybe you didnt so which job have you held which required legal research and investigation and such? Did you pass the BAR exam? Didnt do so so WTF do you render opinions on legal issues upon which you have no basis in education to support such? Or would you like to retract your claim in that link And here I always thought that the difference was that someone who WAS educated would know what subjects they did NOT know and refrain from making idiotic comments on such thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar Edited by boxley March 8, 2003, 01:56:50 PM EST Expand All History
Post #86,749 by Brandioch 3/8/03 12:35:06 PM Reply	You're making it too easy. The first link you posted isn't from me. It isn't even from these forums. :D The second link you posted is from YOU! hahahahahahahahahahaha Here's a free clue, if you want to link to something I said, then link to a post of mine. :D Not something from somewhere else. Not something from yourself. How very, very French of you to do so. hahahahahahahahahaha
Post #86,754 by boxley 3/8/03 1:57:57 PM Reply	So you now deny the quote? will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #86,762 by Brandioch 3/8/03 2:34:46 PM Reply	Neither of the links you posted were from me. Is that concept too difficult for you? Israelies owned slaves, legally, in Israel in the year 2000. Despite all your claims to the contrary. And I have posted FOUR links substantiating that.
Post #86,764 by boxley 3/8/03 2:44:39 PM Reply	one was YOUR post one was mine proving you wrong in your post. recheck the links then deny away. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #86,802 by Brandioch 3/8/03 8:52:14 PM Reply	Bzzzttt! You're wrong again. You posted two links. One wasn't even from these forums. One was from you. NEITHER of them provided ANY substantiation for your claim that Israel did NOT allow slavery in 2002. I provided FOUR links that DO substantiate my claim that Israel had legal slavery in 2002. Ahhhh, I get it. This is another on of your postings where you hope that I'll have forgotten something so you can post lies. :D Didn't work last time. Didn't work this time.
Post #86,805 by boxley 3/8/03 8:56:50 PM Reply	So you deny the quote? let me link again [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86092\|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=86092] And here I always thought that the difference was that someone who WAS educated would know what subjects they did NOT know and refrain from making idiotic comments on such. so now you deny making that claim, typical thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] its all limaq
Post #86,827 by Brandioch 3/8/03 11:32:29 PM Reply	When have I ever denied it?
Post #86,888 by boxley 3/9/03 1:35:49 PM Reply	so you admit to posting it? which will be used sometime over the next 20 years to hoist you in the air again:-) will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]</br> "If you want to meet a group of people who have a profound distrust of, and hostility toward, our legal system, don't waste your time on political radicals; interview a random selection of crime victims, and you will probably find that they make the former group look like utopian idealists by comparison." Dave Robicheaux
Post #86,913 by Brandioch 3/9/03 3:41:28 PM Reply	And that has what to do with slaves in Israel? I didn't think so. But that's the best you can do.

Welcome to IWETHEY!