FYI: Wash Times links don't count. Neither do Nat'l Enquirer

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #86,535 by mmoffitt 3/7/03 3:20:03 PM Reply	FYI: Wash Times links don't count. Neither do Nat'l Enquirer bcnu, Mikem Osama bin Laden's brother could fly in US airspace 9/15/01, but I had to wait for FBI and CIA background checks, 'nuff said?
Post #86,539 by bepatient 3/7/03 3:42:21 PM Reply	So I can reject based on source, too? This could get fun. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #86,542 by bbronson 3/7/03 3:49:21 PM Reply	Silly question. Of course not. ;-)
Post #86,544 by bepatient 3/7/03 4:02:49 PM Reply	Reality...like gravity...sucks ;-) If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #86,545 by mmoffitt 3/7/03 4:11:45 PM Reply	Only if .... you don't try to reject anything from "The Nation" :-) bcnu, Mikem Osama bin Laden's brother could fly in US airspace 9/15/01, but I had to wait for FBI and CIA background checks, 'nuff said?
Post #86,553 by bepatient 3/7/03 4:31:01 PM Reply	Playin hardball, eh? ;-) If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #86,548 by inthane-chan 3/7/03 4:23:26 PM Reply	Wash Times: The paper owned by the moonies IIRC?
Post #86,550 by mmoffitt 3/7/03 4:26:44 PM Reply	That's her and one of marlowe's favorites. bcnu, Mikem Osama bin Laden's brother could fly in US airspace 9/15/01, but I had to wait for FBI and CIA background checks, 'nuff said?
Post #86,569 by Simon_Jester 3/7/03 5:07:33 PM Reply	The Washington Times is the paper that claimed that Clinton stated we deserved to be attacked (9/11) because we had owned slaves. They're hardly credible after that bofo.

Bien sur. - (bepatient) - (9) - March 7, 2003, 02:37:30 PM EST

FYI: Wash Times links don't count. Neither do Nat'l Enquirer -NT - (mmoffitt) - (8) - March 7, 2003, 03:20:03 PM EST

So I can reject based on source, too? - (bepatient) - (4) - March 7, 2003, 03:42:21 PM EST

Silly question. Of course not. ;-) -NT - (bbronson) - (1) - March 7, 2003, 03:49:21 PM EST

Reality...like gravity...sucks ;-) -NT - (bepatient) - March 7, 2003, 04:02:49 PM EST

Only if .... - (mmoffitt) - (1) - March 7, 2003, 04:11:45 PM EST

Playin hardball, eh? ;-) -NT - (bepatient) - March 7, 2003, 04:31:01 PM EST

Wash Times: The paper owned by the moonies IIRC? -NT - (inthane-chan) - (1) - March 7, 2003, 04:23:26 PM EST

That's her and one of marlowe's favorites. -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 7, 2003, 04:26:44 PM EST

The Washington Times is the paper - (Simon_Jester) - March 7, 2003, 05:07:33 PM EST

iwethey.org

My neurons began.. shrieking, best I can remember.
44 ms