IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New checking your memory :)
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Good cover.
When you just can't admit that you were wrong.
New Since I was the one who started those links
I dont think so. If you are looking for an argument finish the last one where you admitted you have no education.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Now, to recap.
boxley complains that only blacks get to own slaves.

I point out that it was legal to own slaves in Israel up until a few years ago.

boxley displays his ignorance by claiming that such hadn't been legal since the year 70 AD.

I provide links substantiating my claim that it was legal into th 21st century.

boxley tries to cover his error by claiming he was testing my memory.

Nice try, but it won't fly.

boxley then claims that HE was right because HE posted links.

Hmmmmm, what part of his 70AD post does he not understand?

Or is this yet ANOTHER case of boxley claiming that what he posted is not what he meant?

:)

And I lay another smack down on boxley.
New onanism has got you by the throat
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Well, that makes absolutely no sense. Congratulations.
New Actually, Bill, Brandi is right.
You DID gibber about "only blacks", and then about "70 AD", and he PROVED you WRONG in both cases.

So what's the fucking bullshit about "testing his memory" (and, even more bizarrely, about "onanism has you in its grip") ?!?

And you sure as fucking HELL didn't "start those links" about trafficking of women in Israel, at least not in THIS thread you didn't.

You're fucking WRONG, so just try to find the fucking guts to SAY so.

Trust me, the world really won't go under if you do.

All that'll happen is, you'll look like a MAN.


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]
New yes Conrad you are right
I did NOT follow brandi's links because he has been circular referencing me lately. I ASSUMED that he was linking to the grand argument I got into a while back with BenT and others over Israel and their current (at the time) lack of laws against the ownership of other human beings. I WAS the one who started THAT thread. I of course stated the 70 AD position because I was hoping he would not remember the prior flamefest over the issue. He did and gleefully posted the links I didnt follow. The reference to onanism was a polite way of telling him to go blow himself.
So in this particular thread for the first and only time EVER I am wrong in a debate with brandioch.
(Ill get hm later)
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Well done.
I am honored to have witnessed this.





(not the first time admission of error, the truly masterful grudging nature of it)



;>
Sometimes, self respect says you just have to speak out.
New thats all right I have an electromagnet with his name on it
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Well that explains it.
#1. You post "facts" that you know are incorrect, hoping that I won't have the correct ones.

#2. You don't follow the links I provide that support my position.

#3. You assume that you already know what I've refering to.

#4. When it is finally ground into you that you're wrong, you go off on some weirdness that has nothing to do with the subject.

:D

Bookmarked.
New Incorrect on number one
No slaves in Israel since AD 70 is a fact. The nation of Israel was destroyed as an entity at that time so they had no governing laws since then. The laws before that time concerning the ownership and feeding of slaves were concise.

The state of Israel established in 1948 was established with no laws against owning people, didnt mention it. Didnt appear to the founders that it would be nescessary. This also is a fact.

both of the above facts are correct. One was deliberately misleading in context.

check your logic.
thanx,
bill

will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Read those links.
Israel did have slaves in the year 2000.

Now, you can go on about whether "Israel" you are talking about is the "Israel" that exists today.

In fact, I fully expect you to.

Despite those 4 links I posted showing that in Israel, there were slaves kept, legally, up until 2002.

No slaves in Israel since AD 70 is a fact.
No, that is a lie. There were slave in Israel in 2002. Since 2002 comes AFTER 70, then there HAVE been "slaves in Israel since AD 70".

The state of Israel established in 1948 was established with no laws against owning people, didnt mention it.
That is correct. It was legal to own slaves in Israel from 1948 until 2002. And slaves were owned.

both of the above facts are correct.
No. One of them is correct. The other is a lie.

One was deliberately misleading in context.
If by "deliberately misleading" you mean "outright lie", well, that would be about par for the course.

Slaves
in Israel
in 2002
legally

You want to argue with that, I have provided links to 4 stories on the subject.

Claim all you want that such was NOT the case, that is simply lies and denial on your part.

Slaves
in Israel
in 2002
legally

And I have posted the links. Here.....[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86421|If by "AD 70" you mean the year 2002....]

Awwww, does that spanking still hurt? I think I jarred your brains loose when I laid that smack down on you.
New so according to you the present country of Israel is
the same as the one disencorporated in AD 70? thank you, will you now assist the current government to get all the trespassers accross the river jordan? Or will you admit that

The Israel existing prior to AD70 is a different Israel than the one today.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New THAT is your rational?
That "Israel" is not "Israel"?

Because YOU were refering to some other "Israel"?

The Israel existing prior to AD70 is a different Israel than the one today.
So, when you complained that only blacks could own slaves...

and I replied that it was legal in Israel to own slaves in 2002...

When you said that I was wrong, it was because YOU were refering to an Israel that had stopped existing in 70 AD...

So, I wasn't wrong.

Yet you said I was. Because "Israel" didn't exist in the 21st century.

But I stated that Israel, in the 21st century allowed slavery.

But, to you, "Israel" does not exist in the 21st century.

Yep. I can see that I'm going to be posting links to this thread a LOT in the future.

hahahahahahahhahaha

You really should have just accepted the smack down and shut up.

:D
New So you admit that Israel of ancient times is the same
as todays state of Israel. If you do not admit they are the same, say so.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Israelis owned slaves in Israel in the year 2000.
I was the one that introduced Israel in that thread. And I gave the time frame in that same post.

So in order for YOU to be right that Israel did not have slaves in 2000....

Well, there is no way for you to be right.

Israelis DID have slaves in the year 2000, in Israel, legally.

Play all the games you want to, but that is a fact.

And I have posted 4 links substantiating that fact.

So now you'll go off on some semantic game about whether "Israel" is "Israel" or whether "Israel" is not "Israel".

Israel, in the year 2000, allowed legal ownership of slaves and slaves were kept in Israel in the year 2000.

I know this must REALLY tear your "Israel is soooo great" heart apart.

But, those are the breaks.
New I would have gone for smug graciousness.
1. It could be worked for a laugh.

2. Or not
Sometimes, self respect says you just have to speak out.
New Could have.
But I have a feeling that I'm going to be linking to this thread many times in the future. If the future reflects the past, which it usually does.

I've suspected for a long time that he was not reading links and simply posting "from the hip" regarding what he thought I was saying and then going through the semantic games in attempts to cover his errors.

Particularly, check the above sub-thread where he's still claiming that slaves were not kept in Israel since 70 AD.

I can't have any lower opinion of Marlowe, yet I still read the references he posts.
New ROLF! the master of semantic games whining
Well one thing is for sure I will be checking ALL links in future. All asides though I enjoy the reparte and consider you a interesting poster always worth a right shift or two.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Rolf Borlandweg!
-drl
New And here's the link.
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86618|Here]

Pay particular attention to the bit where you claim that when I say Israel allowed slavery in 2002 that you say it doesn't because "Israel" doesn't exist.

hhahahahahahahhahahahahaha

Yep, this link is going to get A LOT of usage.

New here is a link of yours claiming that only uneducated people
post on items where they have no knowledge
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86092|fixed link]
followed by a link that proves you are in that group
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86157|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=86157]
have you ever stated an opinion on a legal matter? You know you have, so what law school did you attend? If not law school which law firm did you work for? Maybe you didnt so which job have you held which required legal research and investigation and such? Did you pass the BAR exam? Didnt do so so WTF do you render opinions on legal issues upon which you have no basis in education to support such? Or would you like to retract
your claim in that link
And here I always thought that the difference was that someone who WAS educated would know what subjects they did NOT know and refrain from making idiotic comments on such

thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Expand Edited by boxley March 8, 2003, 01:56:50 PM EST
New You're making it too easy.
The first link you posted isn't from me. It isn't even from these forums.

:D

The second link you posted is from YOU!

hahahahahahahahahahaha

Here's a free clue, if you want to link to something I said, then link to a post of mine.

:D

Not something from somewhere else.

Not something from yourself.

How very, very French of you to do so.

hahahahahahahahahaha
New So you now deny the quote?
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Neither of the links you posted were from me.
Is that concept too difficult for you?

Israelies owned slaves, legally, in Israel in the year 2000.

Despite all your claims to the contrary.

And I have posted FOUR links substantiating that.
New one was YOUR post one was mine proving
you wrong in your post.
recheck the links
then deny away.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
\ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
New Bzzzttt! You're wrong again.
You posted two links.

One wasn't even from these forums.

One was from you.

NEITHER of them provided ANY substantiation for your claim that Israel did NOT allow slavery in 2002.

I provided FOUR links that DO substantiate my claim that Israel had legal slavery in 2002.

Ahhhh, I get it.

This is another on of your postings where you hope that I'll have forgotten something so you can post lies.

:D

Didn't work last time.

Didn't work this time.
New So you deny the quote? let me link again
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=86092|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=86092]
And here I always thought that the difference was that someone who WAS educated would know what subjects they did NOT know and refrain from making idiotic comments on such.
so now you deny making that claim,
typical
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
its all limaq
New When have I ever denied it?
New so you admit to posting it?
which will be used sometime over the next 20 years to hoist you in the air again:-)
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]</br>

"If you want to meet a group of people who have a profound distrust of, and hostility toward, our legal system, don't waste your time on political radicals; interview a random selection of crime victims, and you will probably find that they make the former group look like utopian idealists by comparison." Dave Robicheaux
New And that has what to do with slaves in Israel?
I didn't think so.

But that's the best you can do.
     why is it only black people can keep slaves? - (boxley) - (38)
         Israel had them up to a few years ago. -NT - (Brandioch) - (34)
             till about AD 70 correct -NT - (boxley) - (33)
                 If by "AD 70" you mean the year 2002.... - (Brandioch) - (32)
                     checking your memory :) -NT - (boxley) - (31)
                         Good cover. - (Brandioch) - (30)
                             Since I was the one who started those links - (boxley) - (29)
                                 Now, to recap. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                     onanism has got you by the throat -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                         Well, that makes absolutely no sense. Congratulations. -NT - (Brandioch)
                                 Actually, Bill, Brandi is right. - (CRConrad) - (25)
                                     yes Conrad you are right - (boxley) - (24)
                                         Well done. - (Silverlock) - (1)
                                             thats all right I have an electromagnet with his name on it -NT - (boxley)
                                         Well that explains it. - (Brandioch) - (21)
                                             Incorrect on number one - (boxley) - (5)
                                                 Read those links. - (Brandioch) - (4)
                                                     so according to you the present country of Israel is - (boxley) - (3)
                                                         THAT is your rational? - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                                             So you admit that Israel of ancient times is the same - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                 Israelis owned slaves in Israel in the year 2000. - (Brandioch)
                                             I would have gone for smug graciousness. - (Silverlock) - (14)
                                                 Could have. - (Brandioch) - (13)
                                                     ROLF! the master of semantic games whining - (boxley) - (12)
                                                         Rolf Borlandweg! -NT - (deSitter)
                                                         And here's the link. - (Brandioch) - (10)
                                                             here is a link of yours claiming that only uneducated people - (boxley) - (9)
                                                                 You're making it too easy. - (Brandioch) - (8)
                                                                     So you now deny the quote? -NT - (boxley) - (7)
                                                                         Neither of the links you posted were from me. - (Brandioch) - (6)
                                                                             one was YOUR post one was mine proving - (boxley) - (5)
                                                                                 Bzzzttt! You're wrong again. - (Brandioch) - (4)
                                                                                     So you deny the quote? let me link again - (boxley) - (3)
                                                                                         When have I ever denied it? -NT - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                                                                             so you admit to posting it? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                                 And that has what to do with slaves in Israel? - (Brandioch)
         Re: why is it only black people can keep slaves? - (deSitter)
         OT admin, can we right shift to hearts content yet? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             Equal Time: Demand Left-Shift too.. bloody Repos -NT - (Ashton)

The man with the reverse Midas touch.
282 ms