Thanks for source.

Post #85,499 by Silverlock 3/4/03 12:25:30 PM Reply	Thanks for source. You can spin it as treason if you want to. Others can spin it as misguided protest. But charges were never brought and, according to Beep's definition, since she wasn't convicted, she did nothing wrong. How many lives per gallon? --Sign outside of various churches
Post #85,501 by boxley 3/4/03 12:29:38 PM Reply	I wonder what political party line BeeP took that from? :-) will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #85,507 by Brandioch 3/4/03 12:53:42 PM Reply	I think a case could be made for "treason". But I have not seen anything that would qualify as "war crime". And, as for "treason", the same could be said for just about anyone protesting any war (or possible war). As long as the "enemy" gets it on camera and can "use" it in their propaganda. But we've already passed that point. Our own government has told us that we'd better watch what we way.
Post #85,515 by bepatient 3/4/03 1:14:34 PM Reply	Here we go again. This is the part where the "intellectuals" will start crying and whining about you lying and misrepresenting...yadda yadda. If you would like to continue misrepresenting my opinion based upon your complete lack of knowledge regarding the law...please feel free. It is...however...tiresome at best. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #85,524 by Silverlock 3/4/03 1:49:36 PM Reply	Sorry, forgot to add the "nudge" Even though I am still pissed at you for calling me a liar because my opinion of the law doesn't agree with your opinion of it. Since neither of us are experts in this field, I decided to let it go, reluctantly. I'll still twig you on it though. How many lives per gallon? --Sign outside of various churches
Post #85,566 by bepatient 3/4/03 4:25:19 PM Reply	Apologies. Not really calling >you< anything...as I think you know. Thats more of a statement on the truly sad methods that some (not you) have used to avoid honest debate. We can agree to disagree on legality if you want (as long as I still know I'm right :-))... And I probably should have included my own nudge as well. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

Welcome to IWETHEY!