mmoffitt posts a link to a story. That story does not say unilateral.

JayMehaffey follows that post with a link of his own. That story does not say unilateral.

boxley follows with a post about Kosovo and BOXLEY claims UNILATERAL.

dmarker follows with a post that Kosovo involved NATO and could not be considered unilateral.

boxley follows with a post apparently claiming that dmarkers post was wrong in claiming that a US invasion of Iraq would be "unilateral".

If you're replying to something in a DIFFERENT thread, is it too much effort to link to that thread so that the discussion can be seen in context?

If you aren't replying to something that dmarker said in a different thread, is it too much to ask that you reply to the message your posts follow?