And here's a link to one of your lies.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #84,070 by Brandioch 2/25/03 4:15:20 PM Reply	And here's a link to one of your lies. [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=81797\|read your own post] You claim that I have said that Saddam does NOT have chem/bio weapons. In my post I said that we had NOT found them. So, you are not a liar if "not found" is the same as "non-existant". Sad day for Boxley.
Post #84,085 by boxley 2/25/03 4:56:02 PM Reply	thank you for proving my point you will wiggle any way you can to evade owning up. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #84,087 by Brandioch 2/25/03 4:58:50 PM Reply	Try that one again. No wiggling. I posted a link to a post of your's. You are a liar UNLESS "not found" is the same as "non-existant". I said it was NOT FOUND. You said I said it was NON-EXISTANT. I have provided the link showing EXACTLY that.

US-UK-Spanish draft of new UN SC resolution. - (Another Scott) - (103) - Feb. 24, 2003, 06:16:39 PM EST

So it isn't about terrorism now? - (Brandioch) - (95) - Feb. 24, 2003, 06:36:16 PM EST

Call it.. the Sophistry of Naked Power-speak (?) -NT - (Ashton) - (5) - Feb. 24, 2003, 07:37:04 PM EST

Yup Artful Dodging - bootstrapping on new accusations on way - (dmarker) - (4) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:47:44 PM EST

Is it just me? - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2003, 09:20:12 PM EST

Fair comment - thought everyone knew the tactic - my error - (dmarker) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:43:45 PM EST

I've noticed lately that you seem... - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2003, 11:11:23 PM EST

Do have a lot on my plate - pack for big move - (dmarker) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:10:59 AM EST

They have been reading your posts so kept it simple -NT - (boxley) - (88) - Feb. 24, 2003, 09:01:42 PM EST

Awww, that's cute. - (Brandioch) - (87) - Feb. 24, 2003, 09:55:34 PM EST

what position, I want a war that ends up with - (boxley) - (86) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:16:07 PM EST

I wish that didn't make sense -NT - (Silverlock) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:43:36 PM EST

:-) -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:44:32 PM EST

You know this doesn't mean I won't..... - (Silverlock) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2003, 11:15:45 PM EST

No prob, enjoy the discourse -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 25, 2003, 09:07:59 AM EST

That is a position. - (Brandioch) - (81) - Feb. 25, 2003, 12:14:23 AM EST

why -NT - (boxley) - (80) - Feb. 25, 2003, 09:08:44 AM EST

If you have to ask, you'll never understand. -NT - (Brandioch) - (79) - Feb. 25, 2003, 09:15:31 AM EST

Actually I do understand, you are the antipost - (boxley) - (78) - Feb. 25, 2003, 11:40:44 AM EST

I'll cover this from the beginning. - (Brandioch) - (76) - Feb. 25, 2003, 01:00:34 PM EST

I have proved it many times - (boxley) - (75) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:00:11 PM EST

I posted links to support my position. - (Brandioch) - (71) - Feb. 25, 2003, 04:10:12 PM EST

Sh*t you having a bad day? usually your stuff is better - (boxley) - (70) - Feb. 25, 2003, 04:53:42 PM EST

Every has an opinion. - (Brandioch) - (69) - Feb. 25, 2003, 05:44:05 PM EST

so you state that a missile and a plane is identical? - (boxley) - (68) - Feb. 25, 2003, 05:55:06 PM EST

Both used to intentionally destroy a building and kill the - (Brandioch) - (67) - Feb. 25, 2003, 06:47:32 PM EST

Is that your final definition so we can start? -NT - (boxley) - (66) - Feb. 25, 2003, 07:58:25 PM EST

Yes. As I have stated before. - (Brandioch) - (65) - Feb. 25, 2003, 11:15:19 PM EST

you changed it again, find one and stick to it please -NT - (boxley) - (64) - Feb. 25, 2003, 11:40:43 PM EST

Again. - (Brandioch) - (63) - Feb. 25, 2003, 11:51:00 PM EST

Once, twice, three times. - (Brandioch) - (62) - Feb. 25, 2003, 11:51:41 PM EST

Very good, stable define, lets begin - (boxley) - (61) - Feb. 26, 2003, 08:45:05 AM EST

You make it too easy. - (Brandioch) - (60) - Feb. 26, 2003, 10:27:45 AM EST

so the drunk killing a kid=terrorism/military - (boxley) - (59) - Feb. 26, 2003, 10:41:21 AM EST

How many differing.... - (bepatient) - Feb. 26, 2003, 11:09:18 AM EST

Your logic fails. - (Brandioch) - (57) - Feb. 26, 2003, 12:29:24 PM EST

You have lost - (drewk) - (33) - Feb. 26, 2003, 01:12:30 PM EST

That will never be admitted. - (bepatient) - Feb. 27, 2003, 07:06:10 AM EST

I will clarify that. - (Brandioch) - (31) - Feb. 26, 2003, 02:16:35 PM EST

further clarification - (boxley) - (30) - Feb. 26, 2003, 02:25:22 PM EST

That is the standard, Boxley, admission of defeat. - (Brandioch) - (29) - Feb. 26, 2003, 02:30:34 PM EST

So you admit defeat? - (boxley) - (28) - Feb. 26, 2003, 02:42:16 PM EST

How many children have died because of my views? - (Brandioch) - (27) - Feb. 26, 2003, 02:50:53 PM EST

how many Iraqi kids have died because of his policies? - (boxley) - (26) - Feb. 26, 2003, 02:59:31 PM EST

Marlowe, give the keyboard back to boxley. - (Brandioch) - (25) - Feb. 26, 2003, 04:06:50 PM EST

So no children have died because of his policies lately? - (boxley) - (24) - Feb. 26, 2003, 04:49:20 PM EST

Nice try. :) - (Brandioch) - (23) - Feb. 26, 2003, 06:17:07 PM EST

So when did his policies stop killing children? - (boxley) - (22) - Feb. 26, 2003, 06:20:21 PM EST

When he stopped bombing the Kurds. - (Brandioch) - (21) - Feb. 26, 2003, 06:40:12 PM EST

Is that your final answer? Be very sure -NT - (boxley) - (12) - Feb. 26, 2003, 09:06:58 PM EST

Whee! Let's do it again! - (Brandioch) - (11) - Feb. 26, 2003, 10:23:39 PM EST

just like I thought no balls - (boxley) - (10) - Feb. 26, 2003, 10:59:26 PM EST

Here's a link to your other post. - (Brandioch) - (9) - Feb. 26, 2003, 11:06:30 PM EST

whats the Magic man version of godwin? - (boxley) - (8) - Feb. 26, 2003, 11:27:04 PM EST

Maybe you missed the link to your post. - (Brandioch) - (7) - Feb. 27, 2003, 12:16:53 AM EST

Links, prooves and circular references - (boxley) - (6) - Feb. 27, 2003, 08:53:04 AM EST

Not to mention... - (bepatient) - Feb. 27, 2003, 12:01:30 PM EST

Awwww. Your feelings are hurt, aren't they? - (Brandioch) - (4) - Feb. 27, 2003, 02:33:08 PM EST

would I have to decontaminate it first? :-) -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2003, 04:12:49 PM EST

Would someone mind branching this shite off in a new thread? - (admin) - (2) - Feb. 27, 2003, 04:19:39 PM EST

oops forgot, Im done -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 27, 2003, 04:25:23 PM EST

When did we go back to 1-thread? (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Feb. 27, 2003, 05:04:07 PM EST

Do you really believe that? - (Another Scott) - (7) - Feb. 26, 2003, 10:16:45 PM EST

Hang on. - (Brandioch) - (4) - Feb. 26, 2003, 10:27:06 PM EST

Not very effectively. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 26, 2003, 10:40:42 PM EST

This has nothing to do with winning -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 26, 2003, 11:03:40 PM EST

You are wise beyond your years. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 26, 2003, 11:26:12 PM EST

so you want to pick a date from 2002? -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 26, 2003, 11:04:24 PM EST

dont fsck my setups please :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2003, 11:02:11 PM EST

Hey, I waited over an hour. Sorry. Carry on... :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 26, 2003, 11:07:43 PM EST

heh, - (boxley) - (22) - Feb. 26, 2003, 02:39:25 PM EST

Game, set and match. - (Brandioch) - (21) - Feb. 26, 2003, 02:58:57 PM EST

not hardly, me pointing out the falacy of your logic - (boxley) - (20) - Feb. 26, 2003, 03:02:13 PM EST

Here's a link to your post. - (Brandioch) - (19) - Feb. 26, 2003, 04:01:59 PM EST

your logic not mine -NT - (boxley) - (18) - Feb. 26, 2003, 04:46:24 PM EST

"Can't we play something else?" - (Another Scott) - Feb. 26, 2003, 05:00:05 PM EST

Provide a link to my post. Here's a link to your's. - (Brandioch) - (16) - Feb. 26, 2003, 05:48:39 PM EST

here is a link to yours - (boxley) - (15) - Feb. 26, 2003, 06:12:36 PM EST

From that link your posted. Even from that block you posted. - (Brandioch) - (14) - Feb. 26, 2003, 06:23:18 PM EST

Your logic bomb repeating in my post - (boxley) - (13) - Feb. 26, 2003, 06:25:34 PM EST

My claim. You said I was wrong. Then you said I was right. - (Brandioch) - (12) - Feb. 26, 2003, 06:44:15 PM EST

your claim matches BP's accusations - (boxley) - (11) - Feb. 26, 2003, 09:11:31 PM EST

Here's a link to your post and the quote from there. - (Brandioch) - (10) - Feb. 26, 2003, 10:12:06 PM EST

you were wrong in one post, which one? - (boxley) - (9) - Feb. 26, 2003, 11:23:34 PM EST

Eeek! A ferocious strawman! - (Brandioch) - (8) - Feb. 27, 2003, 12:14:40 AM EST

Box...this ass is playing a game... - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 27, 2003, 07:18:35 AM EST

yabbut Im not bored yet :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2003, 08:54:38 AM EST

Oh. Ok. -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 27, 2003, 11:54:22 AM EST

so you total agree with my position, thank you -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 27, 2003, 08:56:17 AM EST

Eeeek! It's Son of Strawman! - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2003, 02:30:38 PM EST

I claimed for your logic to work - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 27, 2003, 04:15:37 PM EST

Here's a link to your post. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2003, 05:32:09 PM EST

See branch request above. -NT - (admin) - Feb. 27, 2003, 05:39:44 PM EST

And here's a link to one of your lies. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2003, 04:15:20 PM EST

thank you for proving my point - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2003, 04:56:02 PM EST

Try that one again. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 25, 2003, 04:58:50 PM EST

ICLRPD (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Feb. 25, 2003, 01:13:41 PM EST

No need to say any more - (JayMehaffey) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2003, 09:27:11 PM EST

No problem, let them put the men in the field -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 24, 2003, 09:34:30 PM EST

Instant veto. -NT - (Brandioch) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:09:23 PM EST

Love. It. but.. not in the Disneyland World of 02, I think. -NT - (Ashton) - Feb. 24, 2003, 10:56:04 PM EST

Well now. - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2003, 11:57:16 PM EST

and a paragraph on the back one explaining what each one was - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:05:05 AM EST

And creatin a nuisance :) -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 25, 2003, 02:33:42 AM EST

Eeeeeteeeee phone home.
156 ms