is that a correction?

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #82,268 by SpiceWare 2/17/03 2:26:41 PM Reply	is that a correction? Before, women in the country and city were at risk. Now, those in the country. While not a good situation, how is the average worse than before? Darrell Spice, Jr. [link\|http://www.spiceware.org/\|SpiceWare] - We don't do Windows, it's too much of a chore
Post #82,289 by Ashton 2/17/03 4:40:41 PM Reply	Does this bear parsing? IF.. warlords are on the ascendancy, need their perennial habits be labelled precisely as Taliban? Personally, I don't see many generalizations as can stick -today- re Afgh. It is in flux, and the habits, actions of occupying troops are as changeable as -- how desperate Dubya becomes within the next hornets nest he pitches rocks at. We won't know for years if there is a net improvement for females (or anyone). Afgh. will fade from Murican attention span as each new Excitement commands it. It's how we are. Ashton
Post #82,296 by boxley 2/17/03 5:13:41 PM Reply	Read the cite at the start of the thread what is happening now is precisely the nature of the beast. Point of posting. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar

On the nature of the people of Afghanistan, Historical - (boxley) - (23) - Feb. 15, 2003, 11:59:03 PM EST

Boxley possesses the first "anti-clue". - (Brandioch) - (22) - Feb. 16, 2003, 02:13:52 AM EST

You didnt read it or you didnt understand it? - (boxley) - Feb. 16, 2003, 10:51:58 AM EST

Exactly what we're seeing in Afghanistan right now? - (marlowe) - (20) - Feb. 16, 2003, 05:44:08 PM EST

So you're admitting it was just for the pipeline? - (Brandioch) - (19) - Feb. 16, 2003, 05:58:58 PM EST

links on the LESS safe for average people? than taliban? -NT - (boxley) - (13) - Feb. 16, 2003, 06:19:13 PM EST

IF no link THEN switch-off mind. Not even usual slapstick.. -NT - (Ashton) - (10) - Feb. 16, 2003, 09:25:19 PM EST

Your logic is flawed. - (Brandioch) - (9) - Feb. 16, 2003, 09:37:20 PM EST

one has nothing to do with the other - (boxley) - Feb. 16, 2003, 09:49:53 PM EST

I assume you didn't mean this. - (Another Scott) - (6) - Feb. 16, 2003, 10:40:35 PM EST

doesnt count because the inspectors found it -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 16, 2003, 10:42:36 PM EST

Correct me if I'm wrong. - (Brandioch) - (4) - Feb. 17, 2003, 11:40:21 AM EST

My understanding is that it was found recently. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Feb. 17, 2003, 12:01:37 PM EST

I thought it was found before. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Feb. 17, 2003, 03:54:17 PM EST

Your Blix cite is the same as mine. :-) - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 17, 2003, 05:06:13 PM EST

I like the FAS site. - (Brandioch) - Feb. 17, 2003, 09:35:52 PM EST

In other words, you were just talking out of yer ass again. -NT - (marlowe) - Feb. 18, 2003, 01:44:17 PM EST

Box, I can back Brandi on his having posted links - (dmarker) - (1) - Feb. 16, 2003, 11:42:38 PM EST

My apologies I thought the links refered to POW's - (boxley) - Feb. 16, 2003, 11:50:36 PM EST

correct me if I'm wrong - (SpiceWare) - (4) - Feb. 16, 2003, 11:59:27 PM EST

And now they'r in danger if they leave the cities. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 17, 2003, 11:46:41 AM EST

is that a correction? - (SpiceWare) - (2) - Feb. 17, 2003, 02:26:41 PM EST

Does this bear parsing? - (Ashton) - (1) - Feb. 17, 2003, 04:40:41 PM EST

Read the cite at the start of the thread - (boxley) - Feb. 17, 2003, 05:13:41 PM EST

I guess you can't gargle with it.
76 ms