Smoke & mirrors & straw dogs

Post #81,996 by dmarker 2/16/03 12:49:18 AM Reply	Smoke & mirrors & straw dogs Response to fact 1 >> The french have stated that they wish to keep the status quo indefinitely, this begs the question of why as well as looks for motives. << Bill WTF has your response got to do with Blix's report to the UN ??? ***************** Response to fact 2 >> the majority of the UN would vote tommorow to eliminate Israel, station troops in America and disarm the population if they thought they could get away with it. I know that and you know that for a fact. I am not saying or implying that the major powers would want to do that. I am saying a majority would in a shot. This makes the body irrelavent. << What the f* has your response to do with Iraq & UN ??? How can you conclude 'This makes the body irrelavent' from your tangential waffle ???? ****************** Point 3) The distractions you keep plastering us with (who met who in what corridor of the UN) cannot paper over the above fundamental facts. If you do not wish to see the motives and actions behind the public posturings feel free to enjoy your dogma. For a student of history you know damn well its the side conferences and the corredors which make history, not the pronouncements at the news conferences. I would expect better from you. Bill you post pure garbage at times & you are doing it yet again. Cheers Doug
Post #82,003 by Brandioch 2/16/03 2:04:25 AM Reply	You'll get the same feed from a "militia" freak. The UN and "New World Order" and stationing UN forces in the US and taking away all of our guns and so on and so forth........ Boxley seems to have a problem with those OTHER countries having Democratically elected (even "representational") governments. Which might not be so bad if their citizens would consent to swallow the LIES our government keeps spewing.
Post #82,029 by boxley 2/16/03 10:30:18 AM Reply	like saudi arabia? Oh you mean the countries that vote once and the leaders stay until violently overthrown or retire to France. Those democratically elected governments. May you be forced to live in one someday, then come home and sing the praises. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #82,040 by Brandioch 2/16/03 11:47:57 AM Reply	In Germany they have to be violently overthrown? Or France? And so on. You bring up Saudi Arabia? Isn't that one example I keep bringing up of how the US props up a puppet government? But you STILL don't believe that is so? You STILL don't believe that the current government would be overthrown if the US troops were pulled out?
Post #82,027 by boxley 2/16/03 10:26:37 AM Reply	so let me sum up Response to fact 1 >> The french have stated that they wish to keep the status quo indefinitely, this begs the question of why as well as looks for motives. << Bill WTF has your response got to do with Blix's report to the UN ??? ***************** Blix's report as discussed between Blix and Condi, changed after meetings with the French. The French wanted an ambigous report and got it, this begs the question of why as well as looks for motives. Response to fact 2 >> the majority of the UN would vote tommorow to eliminate Israel, station troops in America and disarm the population if they thought they could get away with it. I know that and you know that for a fact. I am not saying or implying that the major powers would want to do that. I am saying a majority would in a shot. This makes the body irrelavent. << What the f* has your response to do with Iraq & UN ??? How can you conclude 'This makes the body irrelavent' from your tangential waffle ???? ****************** you know damn well its true which is why you completely sidestepped the question to mumble Iraq, UN. How could I not conclude that the UN is irrevelant as both an American and a Jew? point 3 your response. You appear to be a person who would look at the opening and closing remarks of a trial and base your decission on the verdict. Me I like to look at the police work, talk to the folks that didnt show up at the trial. Look at the excluded evidence as well as all motions. Thats the difference here. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #82,041 by Brandioch 2/16/03 11:52:03 AM Reply	Riiiiigggggghhhhhhttttt. Blix's report as discussed between Blix and Condi, changed after meetings with the French. The French wanted an ambigous report and got it, this begs the question of why as well as looks for motives. Right. And your reference for this? BTW: Quoting ANYONE in our current regime will NOT be accepted. This regime is also the one that CONTINUALLY lied about what was in other reports to the UN and CONTINUALLY claims to have "information" that it refuses to share with the inspectors. you know damn well its true which is why you completely sidestepped the question to mumble Iraq, UN. How could I not conclude that the UN is irrevelant as both an American and a Jew? And the US was the FIRST nation to put a man on the moon. You CANNOT deny that FACT! Go ahead and try.

Welcome to IWETHEY!